answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

It shows that the organism once had a fully functioning organ/structure, but due to some kind of environmental pressure, that organ was no longer beneficial. Because it was no longer beneficial, it was actually detrimental, because the organism required energy to grow these organs, now wasted energy.

Evolution's mechanism is natural selection. This organ is now being selected against, organisms that grew smaller ones now had an advantage over ones with larger ones. So over time, the average size of that organ within the population will shrink, and it will be considered vestigial when it no longer serves its original function.

There's a reason why vestigial organs do not disappear completely, and that's because when the organ is so small and the organism is not wasting as much energy to grow it, it is no longer being selected against. Or in some cases the vestigial organ does have a tiny bit of use and is now beneficial.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

It shows that the organism once had a fully functioning organ/structure, but due to some kind of environmental pressure, that organ was no longer beneficial. Because it was no longer beneficial, it was actually detrimental, because the organism required energy to grow these organs, now wasted energy.

Evolution's mechanism is natural selection. This organ is now being selected against, organisms that grew smaller ones now had an advantage over ones with larger ones. So over time, the average size of that organ within the population will shrink, and it will be considered vestigial when it no longer serves its original function.

There's a reason why vestigial organs do not disappear completely, and that's because when the organ is so small and the organism is not wasting as much energy to grow it, it is no longer being selected against. Or in some cases the vestigial organ does have a tiny bit of use and is now beneficial.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Yes. Take your coccyx, tail bone, for example. In a remote ancestor this tail was used in a prehensile fashion to grab limbs. In closer ancestors of yours this tail was used for balance. In you the tail is just a vestigial stub used only to complete the pelvic girdle. That is the meaning of vestigial; not used for the original purpose. This supports evolution by showing strongly your connection with many ancestors that possessed tails and tail like appendages. This can be seen at the level of the genes.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Evolution lacks a good eraser, thus stuff that worked in the past is seldom gotten rid of. Thus vestigial organs ... also "junk DNA" ... also lower Back pain in humans.

Yes, some things are removed ... but often as not it just gets reused for a new purpose.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

vestigial organs do not PROVE evolution existed but they are an evidence of evolutioin existing

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

That after a period of time, an organ or body part became obsolete because as the organism evolved, it didn't need it any more. An example is the human appendix

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

It indicates that there's no overall design, more of a patchwork mess of just barely functional.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do vestigial structures support the theory of evolution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What theory does the fossil record support?

It is generally thought to support the Theory of Evolution.


Are humans with tails strengthen Darwin's Theory of Evolution?

Our vestigial tail, the coccyx, shows that we have common ancestry with primates ( monkeys ) that have tails. We, the apes, have vestigial tails preforming some other function than the tails did in monkeys. So, the theory of evolution by natural selection, which posited common descent, would be supported by such a piece of evidence.


How does observed evolutionary change support the scientific theory of evolution?

The theory predicts that evolution will happen and in certain ways. The observed evolution makes this prediction correct. It also defines evolution as happening, and as such is perfect evidence in support of it.


Does the existence of intermediate forms support or not support the theory of evolution?

Intermediate forms are predicted by evolutionary science in several ways. Their presence supports the theory of evolution.


Do you believe that this evidence gives support to the theory of evolution?

I do not so much " believe it " as I an convinced by the myriad lines of converging evidences that support the theory of evolution by natural selection. talkorigins.org


How does the modern theory of evolution explain the loss of vestigial organs?

Use it or lose it. (If it's no longer functional, then any gene mutations that occur will not be weeded out.)


How does modern biology support the theory of evolution?

In every way.


How does Josiah Strong show that he supports the theory of evolution?

There is strong support for the theory of evolution due to fossils that have been found by archeologists. The fossil records show evidence of evolution over billions of years.


Darwins theory of evolution views at the time of his work and social forces that led to support for the theory?

There is no proven theory of evolution only the physical evidence of what Chuck Norris has allowed to live.


How does formation of the cell theory show the process of science?

it shows the process by evolution and study of structures of animals


Most original Native American governments lend support to the?

evolution theory


How have pseudogenes contributed to evolutionary theory?

Pseudogenes are like vestigial structures,they no longer function but are still carried along with functional DNA. They can also change as they are passed on through generations.