It shows that the organism once had a fully functioning organ/structure, but due to some kind of environmental pressure, that organ was no longer beneficial. Because it was no longer beneficial, it was actually detrimental, because the organism required energy to grow these organs, now wasted energy.
Evolution's mechanism is natural selection. This organ is now being selected against, organisms that grew smaller ones now had an advantage over ones with larger ones. So over time, the average size of that organ within the population will shrink, and it will be considered vestigial when it no longer serves its original function.
There's a reason why vestigial organs do not disappear completely, and that's because when the organ is so small and the organism is not wasting as much energy to grow it, it is no longer being selected against. Or in some cases the vestigial organ does have a tiny bit of use and is now beneficial.
It shows that the organism once had a fully functioning organ/structure, but due to some kind of environmental pressure, that organ was no longer beneficial. Because it was no longer beneficial, it was actually detrimental, because the organism required energy to grow these organs, now wasted energy.
Evolution's mechanism is natural selection. This organ is now being selected against, organisms that grew smaller ones now had an advantage over ones with larger ones. So over time, the average size of that organ within the population will shrink, and it will be considered vestigial when it no longer serves its original function.
There's a reason why vestigial organs do not disappear completely, and that's because when the organ is so small and the organism is not wasting as much energy to grow it, it is no longer being selected against. Or in some cases the vestigial organ does have a tiny bit of use and is now beneficial.
Yes. Take your coccyx, tail bone, for example. In a remote ancestor this tail was used in a prehensile fashion to grab limbs. In closer ancestors of yours this tail was used for balance. In you the tail is just a vestigial stub used only to complete the pelvic girdle. That is the meaning of vestigial; not used for the original purpose. This supports evolution by showing strongly your connection with many ancestors that possessed tails and tail like appendages. This can be seen at the level of the genes.
Evolution lacks a good eraser, thus stuff that worked in the past is seldom gotten rid of. Thus vestigial organs ... also "junk DNA" ... also lower Back pain in humans.
Yes, some things are removed ... but often as not it just gets reused for a new purpose.
vestigial organs do not PROVE evolution existed but they are an evidence of evolutioin existing
That after a period of time, an organ or body part became obsolete because as the organism evolved, it didn't need it any more. An example is the human appendix
It indicates that there's no overall design, more of a patchwork mess of just barely functional.
The theory predicts that evolution will happen and in certain ways. The observed evolution makes this prediction correct. It also defines evolution as happening, and as such is perfect evidence in support of it.
There is strong support for the theory of evolution due to fossils that have been found by archeologists. The fossil records show evidence of evolution over billions of years.
There is no proven theory of evolution only the physical evidence of what Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
the actions of organisms as they use or fail to use body structures.
The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution was created in 1983.
It is generally thought to support the Theory of Evolution.
Our vestigial tail, the coccyx, shows that we have common ancestry with primates ( monkeys ) that have tails. We, the apes, have vestigial tails preforming some other function than the tails did in monkeys. So, the theory of evolution by natural selection, which posited common descent, would be supported by such a piece of evidence.
The theory predicts that evolution will happen and in certain ways. The observed evolution makes this prediction correct. It also defines evolution as happening, and as such is perfect evidence in support of it.
Intermediate forms are predicted by evolutionary science in several ways. Their presence supports the theory of evolution.
I do not so much " believe it " as I an convinced by the myriad lines of converging evidences that support the theory of evolution by natural selection. talkorigins.org
Use it or lose it. (If it's no longer functional, then any gene mutations that occur will not be weeded out.)
In every way.
There is strong support for the theory of evolution due to fossils that have been found by archeologists. The fossil records show evidence of evolution over billions of years.
There is no proven theory of evolution only the physical evidence of what Chuck Norris has allowed to live.
it shows the process by evolution and study of structures of animals
evolution theory
Pseudogenes are like vestigial structures,they no longer function but are still carried along with functional DNA. They can also change as they are passed on through generations.