I would never use the word. I would change it to "dumbfounded", as in "She was dumbfounded by the boys' strange behavior." Dumbfounded just means astonished or amazed. Being dumb means not being able to speak, the dumb can't talk, therefore being dumbfounded is just being struck speechless by something.
The math problem left him dumbfounded.
I was dumbfound when Jimmy cheated yesterday
The participles of the verb "to dumbfound" are dumbfounding and dumbfounded. The choice would depend on whether the noun is performing the action or responding to it, with dumbfoundedthe more common.
dumbfounded
Yes.
How would you use theory in a sentence
I would use it correctly in a sentence, of course. Thank you for asking.
Jarry use paroxysm in a sentence.\
Would not that be "Would not that be?"?
You would use 'me' in this case. You use 'I' when you are the subject of the sentence, and 'me' when you are the object of the sentence or the phrase, as in this case.Subject of sentence: I was going to get a picture.Object of phrase: I was going to get a picture of Kaeleah and me.Object of sentence: It was Kaeleah andme in the picture.
reassuring sentence
How would you like me to put that in a sentence?