Yes. But the success of the lawsuit depends on the circumstances and whether you can prove some sort of negligence or strict liability on the part of the property owner. You should seek the advice of an attorney or make a claim against the owner's insurance company for your expenses.
The answer to your question depends on the details of the assault and the property owner's relationship with the assailant. There are so many possibilities they are too numerous to name here. However, if the property owner was responsible for the acts of the assailant such as being the employer and failing to supervise, or providing alcohol that resulted in the situation, there may be some liability. If the owner owed some duty of care to you, there may be some liability.
You need to discuss the situation with an attorney who specializes in personal injury law who could review the details with you and explain your options. That type of case is handled on a contingency basis and an attorney would not take that type of case unless there were damages and substantial enough evidence to support a lawsuit. Some of the first questions you will be asked are: Was the assault reported to the police?; Did you press criminal charges?; Are there hospital records that document the injuries?
Generally, you can't sue unless you were owed some duty of care and the owner did something wrong that resulted in your injury. You need to consult with an attorney who can review your situation and explain your options.
They aren't responsible, how about the person who told you to be there or the person who assaulted you. Maybe nobody. The bank is the legal owner of the property. The former owner has no rights to the property and therefore is not liable. But the first person you should sue is the person who assaulted you, unless they assaulted you in relation to trespassing on a foreclosed property, in which case, you have no case. Consult a Lawyer.
The dog owner is responsible for his dog so you can sue the owner
my husband was assaulted on his own property and his is a convicted felon can he sue the other party for damages
You need to hire an attorney and sue the delinquent property owner.You need to hire an attorney and sue the delinquent property owner.You need to hire an attorney and sue the delinquent property owner.You need to hire an attorney and sue the delinquent property owner.
Generally:Only if the owner agreed to pay you to maintain the property and the owner has refused to pay your bill. Then you must sue the owner in court and obtain a judgment lien that can be recorded in the land records.Generally:Only if the owner agreed to pay you to maintain the property and the owner has refused to pay your bill. Then you must sue the owner in court and obtain a judgment lien that can be recorded in the land records.Generally:Only if the owner agreed to pay you to maintain the property and the owner has refused to pay your bill. Then you must sue the owner in court and obtain a judgment lien that can be recorded in the land records.Generally:Only if the owner agreed to pay you to maintain the property and the owner has refused to pay your bill. Then you must sue the owner in court and obtain a judgment lien that can be recorded in the land records.
No, you sue the owner, which is the estate.
You need to sue the property owner in civil court and win. The court will issue a judgment lien and you can have it recorded in the land records.You need to sue the property owner in civil court and win. The court will issue a judgment lien and you can have it recorded in the land records.You need to sue the property owner in civil court and win. The court will issue a judgment lien and you can have it recorded in the land records.You need to sue the property owner in civil court and win. The court will issue a judgment lien and you can have it recorded in the land records.
In every state I know of, the manager has standing to sue, since he is owed the rent, which he then owes to the owner.
see a doctor. if you were at someone house or on someones property, you could sue them.
Generally, no. The owner of the property, or the lessee in some cases, would be the responsible party if someone was to sue. They could reprimand the employee.Generally, no. The owner of the property, or the lessee in some cases, would be the responsible party if someone was to sue. They could reprimand the employee.Generally, no. The owner of the property, or the lessee in some cases, would be the responsible party if someone was to sue. They could reprimand the employee.Generally, no. The owner of the property, or the lessee in some cases, would be the responsible party if someone was to sue. They could reprimand the employee.
That isn't enough information. I suggest that you talk to a lawyer.
It was important because it made clear that property couldn't sue its owner and that property , in this case a slave, can be taken to free territory and still being property because a owner can take its property wherever they want.