The closest thing that the Catholic Church has in English is the Douay-Rheims translation, which was made about the same time as the Authorized Version.
No, it is a Protestant Bible.
No, King James was a Protestant.
catholic
The Catholic Bible includes the Apocyra, which are Jewish religious books. These Jewish books are not recogonized as being authentic by most Jews, so they are left out of Jewish Holy books and Protestant (King James) Bibles.
13 times in the Catholic New International Version. 54 times in the Protestant King James Version.
Because it is a Protestant Bible.
The Protestant Bible is missing a number of books that are included in the Catholic Bible. Also, there are a number of passages in the Protestant Bible that have been altered a bit to agree with Protestant theology.
There are 14 books considered apocryphal in the King James Version of the Bible. These books are not included in the Protestant canon but are included in the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox canons.
The New King James version is a protestant translation of the Catholic New Testament.
We were just in a hotel room where I actually read the Gideon Bible in the drawer. I noticed that it was a King James Version. Because of the history of strained politics between the Vatican and England, it's safe to say that the King James Version is not a Catholic Bible. Regardless, I'm sure the Gideons would not object if a Catholic were to read their Bible.
Primarily those based on the King James version of the Bible are not acceptable. It does not include the apocrypha and has had too many texts altered to fall in line with Protestant beliefs.
He was in fact born to be a catholic yet took aboard both protestant and catholic viewshis religion is definately meccanese