No, the Ancient Greek number system did not use zero as a place value, or number for that matter.
They contain a zero symbol whereas Roman numerals do not contain a zero symbol because it's not needed
A zero symbol.
There is no symbol in Roman numerals to represent zero.
Roman numerals do not include a symbol for zero, so zero cannot be rendered in Roman numberals.
It can't be represented by any symbol.Another Answer:-The symbol for zero as a Roman numeral is N but it is never needed because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
They contain a zero symbol whereas Roman numerals do not contain a zero symbol because it's not needed
A zero symbol.
There is no symbol in Roman numerals to represent zero.
Roman numerals do not include a symbol for zero, so zero cannot be rendered in Roman numberals.
The lack of a zero symbol creates no problems with Roman numerals.
It can't be represented by any symbol.Another Answer:-The symbol for zero as a Roman numeral is N but it is never needed because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self evident.
There is no symbol for zero in Roman numerals because it isn't neeeded.
There is no symbol for zero, which makes it very difficult to do arithmetic.
DIX (there is no symbol for zero).
It lacked a zero symbol which was not needed
Yes the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N but there was no need to use it because the positional place value of Roman numerals are self explanatory. For example to write out 501 we need to include a zero to represent its real value but the equivalent of 501 in Roman numerals is DI which does not require a zero symbol.
Yes the Romans had a symbol for zero which was N but it wasn't needed in their numeral system because the positional place value of the numerals are self evident.