It does not have dipole-dipole IM forces. The reason for it is that CCl4 is a tetrahedral compound and all of the Cl points away from the central carbon and they are 109.5 degree apart. Therefore they all cancel each other out. The only IM force it has is the london forces.
Yup. One side of CH2Cl2 has C and H atoms, which are very similar in electronegativity. The other side has Cl, the 2nd most electronegative atom. So, obviously electrons would want to be near Cl --> electron cloud is more dense on the Cl side.
Yes. The chlorine atom is more electronegative than the carbon atom, and it will create a partial negative charge around itself. This partial negative charge on the chlorine is balanced out by a partial positive charge on the carbon atom. This is the definition of a dipole
No, both poles of Cl2 have the same charge.
yes! it's dipole dipole intermolecular force. The Lewis structure is a tetrahetron, but Not symmetrical, therefore it's polar, and it's dipole dipole!!
yes. due to the small electronegativity difference between Cl and F, the bond is slightly polar and thus they have dipole forces
Both CH2Cl2 and CHCl3 are bonded in a tetrahedral structure. The net dipole moment of CHCl3 is less than that of CH2Cl2 because the individual C-Cl dipole moments of CHCl3 cancel out each other to a greater extent.
The formula for methylene chloride is CH2Cl2
It is insoluble
no
CH4 + Cl2 → CH3Cl + HCl CH3Cl + Cl2 → CH2Cl2 + HCl CH2Cl2 + Cl2 → CHCl3 + HCl
Both CH2Cl2 and CHCl3 are bonded in a tetrahedral structure. The net dipole moment of CHCl3 is less than that of CH2Cl2 because the individual C-Cl dipole moments of CHCl3 cancel out each other to a greater extent.
The formula for methylene chloride is CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
It is insoluble
tetrahedral
CH2Cl2
no
CH4 + Cl2 → CH3Cl + HCl CH3Cl + Cl2 → CH2Cl2 + HCl CH2Cl2 + Cl2 → CHCl3 + HCl
CH2Cl2
It's tetrahedral.
There are no resonance structures for CH2Cl2.
CH2Cl2 Four sigma bonds as the central carbon is bonded covalently to two hydrogens and two chlorine's.