The short answer is no. However, there is a close relationship between Reina-Valera Version of 1602 and the 1611Authorized King James Version.
Expanded Answer
The King's translators acknowledged several sources which were used to produce the Authorized Version. These were given, "through the good hand of the Lord." In addition to the standard tools used by translators, the men of the King James Bible used previous English and foreign translations as well. Among them was the Reina-Valera Version of 1602, and justly so, for there is a close relationship between the Valera and the KJV. Not only because they are historical cousins based on the same textual type, but because they are equally respected among their respective peoples. Therefore, it is not surprising that the American Bible Society referred to the Valera as, "the King James Version of the Spanish-speaking world." (Remembering Casiodoro De Reina, Bible Society Record, 1969).
The temptation to compare the two is understandable, and anyone who has studied the Valera would be compelled to do so. Dr. Wilton M. Nelson, a former missionary to Costa Rica, noted that the year 1969, "marked the 400th anniversary of the Reina-Valera version of the Spanish Bible, which can be thought of as the Hispanic-American counterpart of the King James Version." (New Light from the Old Lamp, Latin America Evangelist [American Bible Society Publication, Jan./Feb., 1970], p. 9). This does not mean the two are identical, but they are extremely close. Despite several revisions the Valera has undergone, it remains the closest Spanish Bible to the Authorized Version in text, style, and historical impact.
Those who wish to say the Valera is a Spanish King James Bible will be greatly disappointed. It is not totally identical with the KJV in either text or translation (nor, for that matter, can it be). Even if the texts were one-hundred per cent identical, the translation would not be because of certain idioms presented in all three languages (Greek, English, and Spanish). However, the Valera is closer to the KJV than any other Spanish version on the market and may be considered the equivalent to the KJV in Spanish.
Yes.
King James Bible was translated by group of 54 English scholars.
The King James Bible was translated in the year 1611.
No, King James was the English king who had the bible translated from latin to english... hence, the King James' version of the bible.
King James I of England had the Bible translated into English.
The King James Version of the Bible was translated in 1611.
The King James Bible was written because The Bible hadn't yet been translated into English.
The King James Bible was written because the Bible hadn't yet been translated into English.
The English version of the King James Bible was translated in the early 17th century, specifically between 1604 and 1611.
The Authorised King James Bible was translated by over 50 world class scholars taking 7 years to complete (1604 - 1611)
The King James Version was first translated in 1611, it was re-translated and released several times in a short while.
The Old Testament of the Bible was translated from Hebrew to English and the New Testament from Greek.
One of the King James translated the KJV Hebrew and Greek BIBLE to English so Americans can understand it. I'm not sure which King James did so.