As far as abstinence is concerned, fish is not considered as meat.
No. You may eat Fish freely during Lent
it's not red meat, but it is a meat.
No its considered a fish
Fish is fish. It's not considered meat because during Lent when you can't eat meat you eat fish instead!
If the fast is completely against meat, then yes, because fish is considered a meat.
Meat and fish! The phrase "it shall be MEET for you" means "appropriate"
Meat. They are reptiles, and are commonly eaten in the Caribbean and Central America.
i say maybe but keep googling just incase i say mabe because im a catholic and during a lent wich is 40 days we cant eat meat and i asked my mom if we could eat fish nd she said that she considers that cheating and i asked my dad and he said that fish is meat but it isnt considered as meat but again keep googling just in case
To be considered "meat" for the purpose of Friday abstinence the Church meant birds and land mammals, in other words whales, dolphins, and other sea mammals would be considered as "fish" for the sake of Church abstinence. Also, certain dioceses in Michigan have an historic dispensation to eat muskrat on days of abstinence from meat, although I'm not sure how popular that is nowadays.
Fish comes from the water Poultry, commonly known as chicken or turkey, are birds. Meat, commonly considered anything other than poultry and fish, are mammals.
On Ash Wednesday, Catholics would abstain from meat and fast. On Fridays, Catholics would abstain from meat.
The Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary's definition 2b. of meat: . "flesh of a mammal as opposed to fowl or fish". The Catholic Church promotes meatless Fridays but for some reason says that fish is okay. Tradition, I suppose.
In the 1500's Catholic Fishermen were struggling to make a living so they asked the pope for help. He declared meat forbidden during lent but fish was not meat. The fishermen responded by generously donating to the church. There's no religious reason why fish, lobster and shrimp aren't considered meat.