Yes, although technically you could also say correcter, since the rule is that English adjectives take -er in the comparative, no matter how many syllables they may have. But another, unofficial rule is that adjectives from Norman French, such as correct, tend to take the French construction in the comparative, which is with "more."
If you're worried about "correct" being an implied superlative - something is correct or it isn't- don't be. This is English, not Latin.
Yes, it is.
The alternative would be "carefullyer", which is not a word.
The members recognize the importance and effectiveness of the activities but a more clearly communicated three to five year vision may be beneficial.
no, we say BETTER
Yes, more good is used to compare between two adjectives.
Example: He is more good than bad.
The second one is more correct.
Yes, it is grammatically correct.
Yes, Almighty God is grammatically correct.
"That was wrong" is a grammatically correct sentence.
Yes. The form who is the nominative, as opposed to whom.
No. Him and me is correct.
"You were looking good" is the correct grammar. "You" is a second person pronoun that always takes the verb form "were" in past tense, regardless of the situation. "Was" is used with singular subjects, whereas "were" is used with plural subjects.
No, the phrase "more better" is not grammatically correct. "Better" already indicates a comparative degree, so adding "more" before it is redundant and incorrect in standard English grammar.
The phrase "do good to everyone" is grammatically correct, but it may be more commonly expressed as "be kind to everyone" or "treat everyone well."
No.
yup...
good at studies
"Good" is a commonly accepted response to "How are you?" However, it may be more accurate to provide more specific details about how you are feeling to create a more meaningful conversation.
Yes
Yes, "is much more easily" is grammatically correct because it follows the correct order of adverbs (much, more, easily) when comparing multiple items or degrees in a sentence.
Grammatically, the latter is more correct -- a fact that Winston itself admitted.
It is grammatically correct, but not good English because things cannot be in despair. Use "desperate."