Yes, it is fine.
No, the correct sentence is: "Neither he nor you is going to the party." In this case, "is" should be used because neither "he" nor "you" is singular.
Neither Bert, nor Holly is going to the party is the correct form.
No, is should be "are" instead of "is" as the subject is plural
No, come is not a verb and "going to come" implies future reference while "at" is present tense they contradict, the proper sentence would be "who is going to come to your birthday party?"/ "who is going to attend your birthday party?" using the going to future tense or "who will be at your birthday party?" using conditional present
Franci? Lol. BTW, capatialize the I. Re: the suggested answer: The word is "capitalize" from "capital" (not, as the answer says, "capatialize"... from capacious?)
It is grammatically correct but not idiomatically correct - unless you refer to the creation of a political party. Speaking of a social event we say "have a party," "put on a party", "put together a party" or even "hold a party" so the correct idiom would be one of those.
Neither Bert, nor Holly is going to the party is the correct form.
No, is should be "are" instead of "is" as the subject is plural
No, come is not a verb and "going to come" implies future reference while "at" is present tense they contradict, the proper sentence would be "who is going to come to your birthday party?"/ "who is going to attend your birthday party?" using the going to future tense or "who will be at your birthday party?" using conditional present
Yes! Is correct sentence
The correct phrase is "going to a party." This indicates that you are attending a party as a guest or participant.
The sentence is incorrect. The correct version is: 'To the disappointment of the crowd, neither the president nor any of his aides was able to attend the ceremony.' 'Neither' takes the singular form of the verb, not the plural, if the subjects are singular. 'The president' is singular, and 'any of his aides' is singular. However, if at least one of the subjects is plural, so is the verb: 'Neither my parents nor my cousins were able to come to my party.' 'Neither my parents nor my cousin were able to come to my party.' But: 'Neither of my parents was able to come to my party.'
To go. Are you going to go to the party' She asked
I was overwrought when we were going to the party.
Franci? Lol. BTW, capatialize the I. Re: the suggested answer: The word is "capitalize" from "capital" (not, as the answer says, "capatialize"... from capacious?)
his and this are the pronouns in that sentence!
Neither party can obligate the other party to something. They cannot represent the other party to the agreement. They can't buy something and say the other party is going to pay for it.
It is grammatically correct but not idiomatically correct - unless you refer to the creation of a political party. Speaking of a social event we say "have a party," "put on a party", "put together a party" or even "hold a party" so the correct idiom would be one of those.