0
Scientist are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Logos refers to the process of persuading a person or group using supportive evidence. A researcher must conduct experiments using the scientific method, and generate reliable and valid results
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Yes it is true that scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence. For a hypothesis to have value, it must be testable is true also.
A theory is supported by?
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
Why do theories have greater certainty than hypotheses?
The hypothesis is just an idea that a scientist has about the way something works or is--for example, a hypothesis that humans don't breathe at night. This is not necessarily supported by any evidence. It's just what the scientist thinks.Theories are established descriptions of the way something works and are based on great amounts of testing. They also have to be supported by substantial evidence. They are generally accepted by all, or at least most, scientists to be true. An example would be the theory of relativity.
What evidence do scientists find in fossils and living things?
Scientist find evidence about common ancestors.
Do scientist believe some skills can be passed on from generation to generation?
Specific skills such as bike riding? No, as this would be a Lamarckian acquired characteristic and certainly not supported by the evidence and not under epigenetic phenomenon, such as methylation of chromosome that passes from generation to generation.
Scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence?
Yes it is true that scientists are persuaded by logical arguments that are supported by evidence. For a hypothesis to have value, it must be testable is true also.
What is it that makes an argument inductive?
An argument is inductive if its premises provide evidence that supports the conclusion but does not guarantee its truth. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on specific observations or evidence. The strength of an inductive argument depends on the quality and relevance of the evidence provided.
Is scientific evidence supported with theories?
You have it backwards. Theories are supported by evidence. Evidence is not supported by theories, evidence is simply observed.
What are the arguments for and against DNA evidence?
There are many arguments for and against DNA evidence. One argument is that it cannot be disproved as deciding evidence.
Are biased statements supported by evidence?
No, biased statements are not supported by evidence.
A theory is supported by?
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
Why do writer's use evidence in their writing?
They use evidence to support their arguments.
How do you use the word countervail in a sentence?
"The evidence for evolution countervails over the arguments against it." THis means that evidence for evolution counteracts the arguments against it.
How did the speaker address arguments and counterarguments?
A speaker addresses arguments and counterarguments by providing his or her own arguments. The speaker will have to provide evidence that supports his or her own arguments.
What is supported inference?
A supported inference when you draw a conclusion about something using evidence. The evidence is the support for what you have inferred.
Which is true of making multiple arguments about the same piece of literature?
When making multiple arguments about the same piece of literature, it is important to ensure that the arguments are supported by evidence from the text. Each argument should offer a unique perspective or insight into the literary work, helping to illuminate different aspects of the text. Additionally, the arguments should be coherent and contribute to an overall understanding of the themes, characters, and motifs in the literature.
What question should she ask herself to evaluate the paper's writing quality?
She should ask herself: Is the paper clear and well-organized? Are the arguments logical and supported by evidence? Are there any grammatical or spelling errors?
