Yes. Marriage is a right. It is a right applicable to humans. Same-sex couples are humans. Same-sex couples have human rights. Some governments do not permit same-sex couples to marry. Those governments are violating the human rights of same-sex couples.
Opinions are divided -- take a look at the Discussion page. WikiAnswers does not take positions on issues of this sort.
No. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. Therefore, no US state or territory should, or may, deny them this basic civil right.
Yes, it is the malicious obstruction of the civil rights of others.
I would oppose such an amendment as a violation of states' rights as well as the civil rights of Americans.
a violation of a statute
Civil Rights Act of 1964.
No.
There are no logical reasons. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that attempting to ban same-sex marriage violates the constitutional rights of same-sex couples. The equivalent authorities in Canada and Mexico have issued similar rulings.
I wouldn't consider it a violation of ones civil rights. It is important for companies to know that vital information.
The cutting into a child for any reason other than medical emergency is a violation of human rights, assault, and child abuse.
In the broadest sense, it is a human rights violation not to treat a human being like a human being. Racism is the intentional relegation of an ethnic community to a sub-human state, and thus is not, eo ipso, a "violation" of human rights, but it *is* indicative of an attitude which would *want* to violate human rights.
False advertising.
When a Government imposes restriction on the free movement,freedom of expression of its citizens, these will definitely be considered as human rights violation by the Government.
Due to a violation in his parole he was brought back to prison. He thought that what they were doing was a violation of his rights. The police stopped the car as the driver had committed a traffic violation.