Was the US justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima?

already exists.

Would you like to merge this question into it?

already exists as an alternate of this question.

Would you like to make it the primary and merge this question into it?

exists and is an alternate of .

No. Truman had given permission to use the bomb before the warning to surrender was given, so their answer didn't matter. Lives were sacrificied with a bomb that was not fully understood.
6 people found this useful

How did President Truman justify dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima?

The Japanese were very reluctant to surrender. A single previousbombing using conventional bombs had killed about half what theatomic bomb had approximately, yet that had not

Was the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima justified?

Answer . By the standards of today, it probably wasn't justified. By the standards of 1945, it almost certainly was. Bombing of civilian targets (like cities) had been for

Was the dropping of the Hiroshima Bomb justified?

No it was not justified they only real reason why it was dropped was because the US wanted show Russia it had the Bomb many high ranking military official in particular Genera

Was the dropping of the atomic bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified?

Shortly before the US dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, the United Stated showered the Japanese cities of Nagasaki, Hiroshima, and 33 other potential targets with over 5 mill

Why was President Truman justified in dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima?

President Harry Truman had many alternatives at his disposal for ending the war: invade the Japanese mainland, hold a demonstration of the destructive power of the atomic bomb