There are no LAWS in science, a theory is the best you can do.
There are laws in mathematics (it's all man made) and so when a scientific principal is described mathematically it is often described as a law : the law of gravity, the gas laws, etc
but they're just decriptions for the technicians that need to build the gadgets.
A "law" is a theory that explains so much of what we see, correctly predicts so
much of what we can test, and has been around and survived so long, that it's
widely accepted as true.
Neither of them can be "proved". A 'law' is still just a theory, but when a scientific principle is described mathematically it is often described as a law (e.g. the law of gravity).
A theory (hypothesis) is a question, and science (scientific) is what is used to answer the question.
Added:
A theory is NOT a question, it is an general explanation for a phenomenon, or a set of phenomena, and is internally consistent, falsifiable and supported by myriad line of converging evidence. That is the scientific and primary meaning of theory.
There are so many similarities between philosophy and science. The common ones include both being intellectual process for humans, they both focus on reality and not assumptions and so on.
both hyphotesis and theory are scintific.
its nothing really just really stupid
Magic relies on scientific laws to perform what can look like amazing feats. Throughout the years, people educated in science could be regarded as magicians, wizards, and witches. Today, magicians rely on scientific laws to perform magic acts. Science does not rely on magic, but magic relies on science.
The Olive Branch Petition wanted to stay under british laws, and the Common sense wanted full independence.
Both use two factors (Boyle's= pressure and volume of gas, Charles's= temperature and volume of gas), and describe the behavior of gas.
Both have fought Russia, both have well trained armies, and both have laws and constitutions. Those are more of government than cultural, though.
law is based on fact theory is a concept/idea
A scientific theory become a law when it is widely recognized and accepted by the scientific community in the epoch.
Laws are part of theories. The theory is an overall explanation of some phenomenon, and if there is a law that is part of that theory, it is a key idea or a summation of the overall theory. Scientific laws are usually in the form of a mathematical equation, although they can also be succinct statements in normal language, such as the law of survival of the fittest, which is part of the theory of evolution.
a scientific theory is a description of an observed phenomenon while a scientific theory is an explanation of an observed phenomenon
Scientific theory is a well supported by evidence set of principles that explain and predict natural phenomenon. A scientific law explains what some phenomenon does scientifically and under the same conditions.
A scientific theory describes how some particular phenomenon happens or works, and a scientific law is a mathematical, or other very concise summary of the consequences of a theory. Laws and theories, in science, do not form a hierarchy of belief (as some uninformed people believe) in which a theory, when sufficiently confirmed, advances to the status of a law. Rather, laws are part of theories.
most likely
A scientific theory is a theory, no given proof of being a fact, a scientific law is what always happens, essentially a fact. Both is in chemistry and physics. The theory of gravitation happens before it became the Law of gravitation. Scientific theories and laws are similar except laws were proven to be recognize as a fact.
Scientific laws and scientific theories are both based on observations and experimental results.
Idea: Something you think of. Belief: Something you believe is true. Scientific law: Something you believe is true, based on scientific hard evidence. Theory: A set of scientific laws that explain a field of human life or the cosmos. Another Opinion: "Difference" requires Recognition, as well as a Certain level of Honesty with regards to Standards being Universal Via Measurements." This statement, is my Idea, based on a Belief, that a Theory must be plausible with respect to Scientific Laws, therefore, My Idea, My Belief, and My Theory, are Useless, if any, and or all, Contradict the Physical Laws of Nature, also referred to as The Scientific Laws.
No, scientific Laws and scientific theories are not same.Scientific Laws have proofs, they are acceptable by all like Newton's Laws of motion are accepted by allwhere as scientific theories demands proofs, these are not acceptable by all Like Theory by Charles Darwin is not acceptable by all
A scientific law is fundamental, unquestionable and is proven beyond a doubt. Such laws occur in forces like gravitational pull.A scientific theory comprises a collection of concepts including abstractions of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties, together with rules (scientific laws) that express relationships between observations of such concepts. A scientific theory is constructed to conform to available empirical data about such observations, and is put forth as a principle or body of principles for explaining a class of phenomena.A scientific theory is a type of deductive theory, in that its content (i.e. empirical data) could be expressed within some formal system of logic whose elementary rules (i.e. scientific laws) are taken as axioms. In a deductive theory, any sentence which is a logical consequence is of one or more of the axioms is also a sentence of that theory.