More accurately there are THREE areas: intention torts, negligence, and strict tort liability.
A tort is a civil wrong. Tortious liability would be liability for a civil wrong. For example, if a person caused an automobile accident, the person would would be liable in "tort," or would have "tortious liability," for the harm proximately resulting from the wrongful act. Bozarts
Strict liability is a form of civil liability, similar to negligence. The main difference between strict liability and tortious liability is that you can be held liable for any harm resulting from certain activities without any fault, simply because the activity falls within the classification of strict liability. Most states have adopted strict liability in some form, and activities that qualify fall into two general categories.
A tortious is related to the duty of care and negligence of that duty with respect to persons with whom there is no contractual liability. For example, if the person fails to maintain his property and part of his property falls off and injures another person, the property owner is liable for the damages to that person, even though it maybe be passerby with whom there are no contractual obligations.
Professor P.H. Winfield
The word "tortious" is pronounced as TOR-shus. The emphasis is on the first syllable, and the "t" is pronounced like the letter "t" in "top."
misconduct
The root word "tort" comes from Latin, meaning "wrong" or "injury." It is the basis for the legal term "tort," which refers to a civil wrong that causes harm or loss to another person, leading to legal liability.
The word is spelled tortious. It refers to acts that fall under tort law. In a sentence... Principals are liable for the tortious acts of their agents.
Commercial entities and entities other than natural persons can be party to essentially every tort known to the law through various intersecting theories, including as to vicarious liability as to torts committed by natural persons against natural persons.The specific "business torts" are (1) tortious interference with the benefit of contract; and (2) tortious interference with an advantageous business relation.
Bodily injury liability and property damage liability.
None of the statements contained in the question are correct. Torts are civil wrongs, as opposed to criminal offenses.
There is more freedom in contractual law where as in tortuous liability it is more of imposed nature. The claimant will receive compensation for damages and expected earnings in the case of contract liability where as the claimant can only claim damages as in the case of tortuous liability. There is more privacy in the contract in the case of contractual liabilities as the parties who are involved in the contract are the one who can actually sue for damages as in the case of ATKIN V SOUNDERS(1942) whereas in tortuous liabilities any one as a third party who had suffered losses or damages can claim compensation from the defendant.