0
What are your views of the fortunes of human rights between a religious state and a secular state?
Ganyobitete
The human rights only want to get human rights but with out religion in the world their woldnt be humas rights at all. Religion keeps people from doing bad stuff because with out believing in a God people woundt be interesting in their lives because they are gonna think " why do I make good deeds if when I die I'm not gonna go anyware" so religion is plays a good role in the world and you should believe in a God because you know there's a God, you can see his finger prints in the world, like the nature, the human life and miracles and Jesus the one that founded the Roman Catholic Church. That's why a secular state would not be good for the country or society.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between a secular and theocratic state?
A secular state is one that does not officially align with any religion and ensures separation of religion and government, while a theocratic state is one where religious leaders or religious institutions hold political power and influence government decisions based on religious principles. In a secular state, laws are typically based on democratic principles and human rights, whereas in a theocratic state, laws are often based on religious teachings or interpretations.
Is Iraq a secular country?
Iraq is officially an Islamic country, but it does have provisions in its constitution to protect religious freedom and the rights of minorities. However, in practice, religious influences play a significant role in the country's governance and society.
How do secular humanists veiw sexuality?
Many secular humanists are not as intolerant as religious people when it comes to different sexual orientations. Since secular humanists do not follow the religious teachings found in holy books, they are more likely to be tolerant of gay marriage and equal rights for people with different sexual orientations.
What are the disadvantages of a secular state?
Some disadvantages of a secular state can include potential challenges in balancing the rights of individuals with conflicting beliefs, controversy over the separation of religion and state, and difficulty in addressing the needs and concerns of diverse religious communities. Additionally, there may be criticism from some religious groups who feel marginalized or excluded in a secular system.
Is The enlightenment a religious movement?
The Enlightenment was not a religious movement but rather a cultural, intellectual, and philosophical movement that emphasized reason, science, and individual rights. It sought to challenge traditional religious authority and promote secular thinking. While some Enlightenment thinkers were critical of organized religion and promoted secular humanism, others sought to reconcile reason with faith.
How is life in democracy for religious minorities?
AnswerModern secular democracies provide freedom of worship and guarantee the rights of religious minorities, with many of them employing officials to ensure those rights.However, not all democracies are secular, and some may claim to be democratic, but really prejudiced in favour of one dominant religion, and oppress religious or ethnic minorites. In some of these democracies, life can be difficult for religious or ethnic minorities.
What does it mean to say that the Enlightenment was a secular movement?
The Enlightenment was a secular movement because it emphasized reason, science, and individual rights over religious dogma and divine authority. It sought to challenge traditional beliefs and promote the idea of progress through human understanding and empirical evidence rather than through religious faith.
What does secular mean and what makes turkey secular?
Secular means the separation of religion and state. Turkey is considered secular because its constitution mandates the principle of secularism, ensuring the state's neutrality in religious matters and granting equal rights to all citizens regardless of their religious beliefs.
What is wrong with a non-theocratic government legalizing same-sex marriage?
There is nothing wrong with making same sex marriage legal in a secular country. Non- religious governments must treat all citizens fairly. Marriage brings a collection of exclusive civil legal rights to the happy couple. Civil legal rights should be available to all citizens.There is nothing wrong with making same sex marriage legal in a secular country. Non- religious governments must treat all citizens fairly. Marriage brings a collection of exclusive civil legal rights to the happy couple. Civil legal rights should be available to all citizens.There is nothing wrong with making same sex marriage legal in a secular country. Non- religious governments must treat all citizens fairly. Marriage brings a collection of exclusive civil legal rights to the happy couple. Civil legal rights should be available to all citizens.There is nothing wrong with making same sex marriage legal in a secular country. Non- religious governments must treat all citizens fairly. Marriage brings a collection of exclusive civil legal rights to the happy couple. Civil legal rights should be available to all citizens.
Would people enjoy more freedom in oligarchy or tyranny?
Neither. The oligarchy is a religious run government while a tyranny is a secular dictator. Both do not give people choice nor civil rights.
Is Turkey a Muslim or Jewish state?
TURKEY is a predominantly Muslim country, though the rights of other religious groups are protected in law. Strictly speaking, TURKEY considers itself a secular star but in practice, the majority faith is Islam.
What is a secular Christian?
A secular christian is a christian is one who believes that the united states is a secular nation where anyone can live regardless of their faith choices and firmly upholds the constitution. They believe that Jesus was the son of God, but they are the opposite of the spectrum when compared to fundamentalists and extreme conservative christians. They tend to believe in equal rights and don't judge meaning they actually follow the Bible. My critique of them, I get this. These are the best Christians, in my opinion, because their beliefs do not interfere with scientific advancements, and they believe in the a secular nation and are anti theocracy. For our founding fathers were all too aware that religion mixed with government meant persecution and a lack of rights for others. They tend to be the most liberal Christians, this includes giving everyone the same rights as human beings, gays, atheists, muslims, etc. If this is wrong, then please edit. If correct give a *. here
