The Gold Foil experiment demonstrated the (at the time) surprising result that atoms had nuclei. The prevaling model for atoms at the time has been described as "grapes in Jell-O" (with electrons - "grapes" - suspended in a uniform field of positive charge, the "Jell-O"), and the alpha particles Rutherford (actually, it was his students, Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden) was shooting at the foil were expected to pass nearly straight through with only minor deviations.
Instead, what was observed was what Rutherford described as "firing a 15-inch shell at a piece of tissue paper and having it come back and hit you," because it turns out that all the positive charge in the atom is concentrated within a very small region ... the nucleus, and the alpha particles recoiled quite strongly from this concentration of charge.
By shooting alpha particles at gold foil, some particles bounce back.
He show a model of his butt.
The nucleus in an atom.
That depends on the result of the experiment. The experiment is a way to test a hypothesis, and it's completely fine if the experiment disproves the hypothesis. Ideally, though, the experiment will support the hypothesis.
An experiment can prove they are wrong or right ...:)
The first step is to decide on the purpose of the experiment. What is it that you are trying to prove or disprove.
This quote means noting can me right
A hypothesis is tested in a scientific investigation.
He proved that atoms are not full of a positive material but mainly open space.
We should never say that an experiment has proven something. The Rutherford gold foil experiment led to the hypothesis that an atom's positive charge is concentrated in an incredibly small space at the atom's center.
That atoms are mostly empty space and they have a positively charged nucleus.
Einstein did not prove the existence of atoms. This was done by Ernst Rutherford at McGill university using X-rays shot through a piece of gold foil. He found that X-rays were able to pass through a piece of thin gold foil, but that they were scattered in some instances. By doing this, he elucidated the subatomic structure of the atom as a nucleus surrounded by an electron cloud.
He found that the atom was made up of mostly empty space.
An experiment can prove or disprove a hypothesis.
the existence of released energy
The Gold Foil Expirament-Rutherford A line of photons were shot through a thin piece of gold, and rutharford theorized that they should pass through. However some passed through while others deflected and some reflected backwards. It gave proof that atoms have a nucleus
Prove causation
How do you proof of the existence of back emf ?
Experiment
No. Any person trained in logic will tell you that 'you cannot prove a negative'. If you want to disprove the existence of fairies you first attempt to try and prove their existence. And the best you can do is to fail to prove it. The option to prove it always exists.