The 1996 Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") did two things: (1) prohibited the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriage; and, (2) enabled individual states (and Native American tribes, btw) to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states.
On June 26, 2013, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Section 3 of DOMA, the part which prohibits federal recognition of same-sex marriages, is unconstitutional. The Court let stand, however, the other part (Section 2), which permits states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages performed elsewhere.
DOMA, the Defense of Marriage Act, has been struck down in its entirety as unconstitutional and is no longer in effect.
No. The Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA") did not deal with civil unions. In any event, DOMA has been struck down as unconstitutional and is no longer in effect.
Senator Burr favors a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. He is very unlikely to support the repeal of DOMA.
Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA"), 1 U.S.C. § 7 and 28 U.S.C. § 1738C.
The 1996 Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA"), like all federal laws, should be just. Unfortunately, it is not.
As a senator, he could vote to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA").
Senator Klobuchar believes DOMA is unconstitutional and is co-sponsor of the Respect for Marriage Act which seeks to repeal DOMA.
Senator Akaka believes DOMA is unconstitutional and is co-sponsoring the Respect for Marriage Act which seeks to repeal DOMA.
Senator Boxer believes DOMA is unconstitutional and is co-sponsoring the Respect for Marriage Act which seeks to repeal DOMA.
Senator Bennet believes DOMA is unconstitutional and is co-sponsor of the Respect for Marriage Act which seeks to repeal DOMA.
Senator Blumenthal believes DOMA is unconstitutional and is co-sponsor of the Respect for Marriage Act which seeks to repeal DOMA.
Senator Durbin believes DOMA is unconstitutional and is co-sponsoring the Respect for Marriage Act which seeks to repeal DOMA.