0
What does without merit and the jury's verdict and the ruling should be affirmed mean?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why do people tell other people what size they should be?
for them to be affirmed or criticized
What was the verdict in the abuse trial things fall apart?
The verdict was that man and woman should not fight as husband and wife. The man should offer wine to his relatives and the wife should go back. The man should beat his wife no more.
Can you sell or sign over your assets if they are a part of an ongoing case?
No. Assets that are the subject of an active case should not be transferred until there is a ruling issued.No. Assets that are the subject of an active case should not be transferred until there is a ruling issued.No. Assets that are the subject of an active case should not be transferred until there is a ruling issued.No. Assets that are the subject of an active case should not be transferred until there is a ruling issued.
What should be the ruling factor in a free country?
the law
What should you do after the verdict of supreme court in the UAE?
Depends on the verdict and circumstances of the case. Normally and if memory serves me correctly you are allowed one written appeal against the verdict. As the UAE used Sharia Law, it would be best to take advice from a competent lawyer who practices either UAE corporate law or Sharia Law
How does a confession affect a jury's decision?
Unless the confession is to a crime that the jury does not think should be a crime, then they will return a verdict of "guilty". If they actually do dislike the law, they'll return a verdict of "not guilty", even though they know he/she technically is guilty.
What is the answer for Do you think the verdict by commission of enquiry was on expected line?
It's difficult to predict the outcome of a commission of inquiry as it depends on the evidence presented and the judgement of the members. Their verdict should be based on the facts and findings of the investigation, rather than being influenced by personal expectations.
Which of the following should be included in an opening argument?
a descrition of the crime the effects of the crime a summary of witnesses and evidence a verdict and sentencing reccomendation
Can a judge overturn a guilty plea?
Generally any presiding judge (the judge that ran the trial) can set aside a jury's guilty verdict if they find it is against the weight of the evidence or not based on relevant law. A judge cannot overturn a not guilty verdict.In the U. S., a court may overturn a jury verdict of "Guilty" and enter a judgment of acquittal or order a new trial in a criminal case. The basis for such action includes situation where the jury has brough in a verdict that is not supported by the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. This may happen where a jury is prejudiced against a defendant or makes a mistake in its fact finding or application of the law to the fact after the court jury instruction.United States Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29 states:(a) Before Submission to the Jury. After the government closes its evidence or after the close of all the evidence, the court on the defendant's motion must enter a judgment of acquittal of any offense for which the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction. The court may on its own consider whether the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction. If the court denies a motion for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the government's evidence, the defendant may offer evidence without having reserved the right to do so.(b) Reserving Decision. The court may reserve decision on the motion, proceed with the trial (where the motion is made before the close of all the evidence), submit the case to the jury, and decide the motion either before the jury returns a verdict or after it returns a verdict of guilty or is discharged without having returned a verdict. If the court reserves decision, it must decide the motion on the basis of the evidence at the time the ruling was reserved.(c) After Jury Verdict or Discharge.(1) Time for a Motion. A defendant may move for a judgment of acquittal, or renew such a motion, within 14 days after a guilty verdict or after the court discharges the jury, whichever is later.(2) Ruling on the Motion. If the jury has returned a guilty verdict, the court may set aside the verdict and enter an acquittal. If the jury has failed to return a verdict, the court may enter a judgment of acquittal. Subsections (b) and (c) make it absolutely clear that a court may set aside a jury verdict of guilty in a criminal case. The Rules do not give the court any authority to set aside a verdict of acquittal.The reason the FRCP do not permit a court to set aside a jury verdict of acquittal and enter a judgment of guilty is to preserve the Sixth Amendment guarantee that all criminal defendants shall enjoy the right to a trial by jury as well as to preserve the Fifth Amendment prohibition against double jeopardy.The reason the FRCP permit a trial court to set aside a jury verdict of guilty and enter one of not guilty, is to preserve the defendant's right not to be convicted of a crime except on evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. In the interests of justice, no trial court should let stand a verdict of guilty where the evidence does not prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.These rights apply to state courts as well as to Federal courts because they have been incorporated into the 14th Amendment because they are a fundamental part of our jurisprudence.Note that these are the Federal court rules; however most state court rules are modeled after the Federal Rules and all will have some variation of the authority to set aside a guilty verdict.
What is the verdict of Jesus' crucifixion?
Pilate declared the verdict in John 19:13,14:"When Pilate heard these words, he brought Jesus out and sat down on the judgment seat at a place called The Pavement, and in Hebrew, Gabbatha. Now it was the day of Preparation of the Passover; it was about the sixth hour. He said to the Jews, 'Behold your King!'"He also wrote the verdict on the cross, what is written on most of crucifixes today:"Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews."It was a custom to write the verdict on the cross in Roman Empire.One can think there is a discrepancy between the verdict (what is not guilt, but in fact true) and the crucifixion. Practically, Pilate let Jesus be crucified because people wanted it, not because he foud him guildy. Teologicaly, crucifixion is the consequence of being true King of Jews, so of the verdict, as it should be.
What is a concern related to most versions of the western literary canon?
Everyone agrees on which works should be in it.It reflects the tastes and values of the ruling classIt reflects the tastes and values of the ruling class
What dose it mean if a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
