What group formed in Boston to lead oppsition to the act?

already exists.

Would you like to merge this question into it?

already exists as an alternate of this question.

Would you like to make it the primary and merge this question into it?

exists and is an alternate of .

The angry colonist was the group formed in Boston to lead opposite to the act
1 person found this useful

Boston medical group?

What is Boston Medical Group? Established in the U.S. 1998, Boston Medical Group is a network of independent physicians that has dedicated its practices to treating sexual dysfunction - specifically erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Using The Boston Method, a proprietary treatment program, Boston Medical Group physicians provide personalized treatment programs that enable men to improve their sexual function. Boston Medical Group is not affiliated with the Boston Medical Center, nor does Boston Medical Group have an office or location in Boston. A prominent treatment recommended by Boston Medical Group is intracavernous pharmacotherapy (ICP), which consists of administering an injection of a vasodilator drug directly into the penis, which increases blood flow, and causes an erection in minutes in many patients. First introduced by urologists in the early 1980s, intracavernous pharmacotherapy (ICP) is widely recognized as a highly safe and effective method to treat erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation. Until the advent of popular ED pills in the late '90s, ICP was the most common way for men with erectile dysfunction to attain an erection; even still it is the preferred method of many physicians and is used especially for men who take nitrates or have other health conditions. Boston Medical Group maintains clinics in 21 locations in the United States, in addition to international locations in Europe, South America, and Asia.

What was the Boston Tea Act?

The Boston tea act was an act that people did because they got mad. They got on a ship and threw boxes and boxes of tea into the lake the boat was in.

What events lead to the quartering act?

POOP ON A SHOE *Whoever wrote the above answers must have been crazy* Some of the events that led to the quartering act were the French and Indian War and the British Impose to the new taxes. See here for more info: http://www.historycentral.com/Revolt/causes.html

Who was in the Boston stamp act?

The stamp act put a new tax on several items. I don't know why it would be called the Boston stamp act and I don't think it mentions any names... so the answer is nobody.

How did the Stamp Act lead to war?

Because after the french and Indian war the british had spent a lot of money for supplies for the war like guns, or other, so England was in debt and they decided to pay it back by taxing the colonists. The stamp act taxes things that were stamped, the colonists didn't like it so it got them angry. But also since the colonists got more taxes like the sugar act, townshend act, etc.

What lead up to the Boston massacre?

The colonists were angry and resentful over the Townshend Acts andthe Stamp Act imposed upon them by the British Parliament. Theyreferred to them as the Intolerable Acts. On March 5, 1770, a groupof colonists were taunting some of the British soldiers stationedin Boston. After being threatened verbally and having things thrownat them, the British soldiers fired into the crowd killing fivepeople and wounding six others. This incident became known at theBoston Massacre.

How does lead form?

lead is an Element, so it's rather difficult to explain. A star burns by fusing hydrogen into helium and helium into lithium and so on right up the periodic table. Useually stars get to about iron before they turn into black dwarfs or white dwarfs but larger stars that burn hotter can create heavier elements like gold and lead.

How did the Quartering Act lead to the Boston Massacre?

the quartering act was a law that said colonists had to give food, beds, and a home for the soldiers stationed there. the colonists thought that was unfair and when they saw them they were reminded that Britain was trying to bully them.

Was the stamp act in Boston?

The Stamp Act (1765) affected all of the American colonies by taxing paper goods, which had to have a revenue stamp affixed. This wa a direct tax that the colonists protested as being enacted without their representation or benefit.

What was the lead-lease act?

The lead-lease act was implemented in 1941 as a way to help duringWorld War 2. The act allowed the United States to lend aid to theallies.

Boston port act?

In an attempted to regain control over Massachusetts, Parliamentpassed the Boston Port Act. This was in response to the Boston TeaParty. The city of Boston was ordered through the Boston Port Actto pay for the cost of the tea and damages that was encountered.

What is the Boston port act?

by Boston tea party, parliament closed the harbor in Boston, to all ships no matter what business the ship had.

What act closed Boston harbor?

The act that closed the Boston Harbor was the Boston Tea Party.This act was a revolt by the Americans against the British fortaxes in 1773.

How did The Intolerable Acts punish Boston?

the intolerable acts punished boston because they knew colonist were not going to pay for the damages that they caused during the boston tea party so to punish them the parliament decided to put taxes on everything and as part of the quatering act to let british live in vacant houses of the colonists.

How does the Boston tea party leads to intolerable act?

The boston tea party led to the intolerable act because thecolonist when on the britist boat that had tea and the colonistthrow the tea off board. the britist couldn't do anything thegoverment was the only one who could stop the colonist. later whenthe goverment found out they had to punish them so they passed theintolerable acts with means british soilers could come in colonisthome for free and colonist could do nothing.

What did the quartering act lead to?

It forced the local governments of the American colonies to providethe British soldiers with any needed accommodations or housing. Italso required colonists to provide food for any British soldiers inthe area. It was stated in the Declaration of Independence as one of thejustifications for declaring independence. ..."He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armieswithout the Consent of our legislatures. He has affected to render the Military independent of and superiorto the Civil power".... ... "For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us: For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for anyMurders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of theseStates:..." Memory of it also was the motivation for the Third Amendment to theUS Constitution (in the Bill of Rights) "No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house,without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in amanner to be prescribed by law."

What lead to the Boston Tea Party?

The final act that lead to the Tea Party was the imposition of a TAX on British Tea that was sent to America. This was "Last Straw" so to speak for the Colonists'.

You lead a group or you led a group?

It depends on what tense you want it in. I lead a group is present, or you can use it for future as well as in: I will lead. If you want it to be past tense (the most common form of writing), you would say I led a group. I hope this helps :)

How did the townshend act lead to war?

The Townshend Acts applied duties (taxes) to paper, paint, lead, glass, and tea imported by the colonies. Townshend had studied the colonist's distinction between internal and external taxes and he believed his duties were external as none of the products, except tea, could be made in the colonies. The colonists did not agree with his thinking and the result was a colonial boycott against British products. Trade between England and America fell off by 50 percent as a result of the boycott. The British merchants complained to Parliament who repealed the Townshend Duties except the tax on tea. The tea tax was kept in honor of the Declaratory Act. Parliament passed that act to declare that they did have the right to tax the colonies regardless of the American claim of internal or external taxation. The colonists would claim that the Declaratory Act was unconstitutional because the colonies did not have representation in Parliament. Great Britain claimed the colonies were represented “virtually,” as Parliament represented all areas of the British Empire, regardless of whether or not a colony elected a representative to that legislative body. Thus, the debate over whether the colonies did have representation in Parliament would not be settled until the Revolution.

What is the significance of the Boston port act?

In a breif explanation, the Boston Port Act punished all of Boston for the Boston Tea Party, thus it forced Boston to seek aid from the other colonies. Because of this is helped strengthen colonial unity and was another factor in sparking the upcoming revolution.

Did the Boston Tea Party Lead to the Boston Massacre?

No, the two are not related to each other. Infact, the Boston Tea Party occurred after the Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre (1770) was an instance of manslaughter. A mob of Bostinians were provoking the British army that was stationed there. They started throwing rocks, mud and etc. The British soldiers were alarmed and called for their Captain to help bring peace. However, one of the soldiers mistakenly heard the Captain say Fire! when he arrived and he started firing. A couple other soldiers joined in shooting until they were stopped shortly after. Five Bostinians were down on the ground. Three were wounded and two were killed. This was considered an outrage in the colonies. A trial was to be held, but no one wanted to represent the British soldiers. Two lawyers stepped up because they felt that these people desereved a chance. These lawyers were Samuel Adams and John Adams. In the end, the soldiers were found guilty of manslaughter and not murder. The Boston Tea Party (1773) was the event that was a result of angry colonists. The colonists did not agree with Britian's Tea Act and this was a way of rebelling against it. Britain had refused to remove their ships with tea from Boston's port. So, in the middle of the night, colonists dressed up like Indians and went aboard their ships. They dumped all the tea into the Boston Harbour. This outraged the British government and they demaned a payment for the lost tea. Boston would not pay, so their port was shut down by Britain. These two acts have nothing in common, except for the location and the type of people invovled. No. The Boston Massacre happened BEFORE the tea party.Hancock paid and organized it and had Samuel Adams organize the men.They didn't dress up. This is part of the fable. The Boston Tea Party was a protest of the lowering of the cost of the British tea by the government and the East India tea company who had gotten a bail out from the crown in 1773. The smugglers in the colonies found the Dutch tea that they sold was higher in price than the British tea, so they staged the Boston Tea Party and others in harbors in the colonies ( Hamilton was one of the largest smugglers in the colonies and a founding member of the Son's of Liberty). The cost of tea also went as far back as the Navigation Acts and the restricting of trade to and from the colonies passed from 1650-1733. Tea was also taxed in 1767 in the Townsend Acts.

What events lead up to the Boston Massarce?

There were several events that led up to the Boston Massacre, however, where the true tension began is anonymous. The whole dispute between Americans and Great Britain began when British Parliament began to tax things. For example, the Sugar Act placed a tax on molasses, but this was not taken extremely offensive by the colonists. When the Stamp Act was passed, all items with print were taxed. This meant marriage licenses, newspapers, and even playing cards had a tax on them. Americans began to protest British Rule and they boycotted British goods. The Stamp Act was finally repealed by Parliament a year later. Several acts followed the Stamp Act, including the Townshend Acts and, the act that infuriated colonists the most, the Tea Act. This act placed a tax of three pence on tea imported from Britain. This act especially angered colonists because of how popular tea was in the colonies. After much protesting, Parliament still refused to repeal the act. Colonists banded together, forming secret groups such as the infamous Sons of Liberty. The Sons of Liberty then organized what would become one of the most famous American protests. They were responsible for the Boston Tea Party, which protested against taxation without representation. Angered even further when Americans refused to pay for the tea through the Fiddler's Bill, all residents in the thirteen colonies were punished. Boston Harbor was closed and Americans had to rely on each other for personal needs like food and supplies. British soldiers were sent to America who could commandeer any belonging of the Americans. They even challenged Americans in their jobs, working for smaller wages than Americans could afford. As ties with Great Britain broke, even Loyalists changed sides. Patriots would molest the British officers, which led to the well known incident which Paul Revere would later use as propaganda, calling it the Boston Massacre.

How did the coercive acts hurt Boston?

The Coercive Acts stated that Boston Harbor would be closed until all the tea dumped during the Boston Tea Party were fully paid for by the colonists; therefore, it deprived Boston of its water trade.

Who has the leading role in Acts of the Apostles?

A: Who was intended to be the main character in Acts of the Apostles comes down to what the author's intention was in writing the book. In support of Acts as a book of history, Sir William Ramsay stated " Luke is a historian of the first rank; not merely are his statements of fact trustworthy...this author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians ." This is now strongly disputed. Uta Ranke-Heinemann ( Putting Away Childish Things ) says that anyone familiar with recent scholarship would laugh at Ramsay's claim, and says that the whole book is a work of propaganda aimed at Gentile Christians and Gentiles who have not yet become Christians. Hans Joachim Schoeps writes that Acts has been believed much too readily, saying that Acts is only a retrospective view of Christian origins written by one party - the winners. The book of Acts is not a history and was written for a purpose. The two main characters in Acts of the Apostles are Peter and Paul, and it would seem that the book is really about Paul. George Wells ( Evidence for the Historical Jesus ) quotes A. J. Mattill as saying that the dominant view of Acts' presentation of Paul is that in Acts and the epistles there are two Pauls, the historical Paul of the authentic epistles and the legendary Paul of Acts. In my view the purpose of Acts was to compare Peter and Paul, in order to show Peter to be the greater apostle. In every subtly comparison between the two apostles, Peter always comes out ahead. In his own epistles, Paul says that he was chosen by God to preach to the gentiles, but Acts says that his first attempts at preaching were to the Jews of Damascus and that it was Peter who decided that the Church should preach to the gentiles, after Peter had been told this by an angel. According to Acts , Paul's first miraculous cure was improbably similar to Peter's first cure. In both cases, a man who had been lame since birth was immediately cured by being commanded to stand and walk. Peter's first miracle cure was performed in the name of Jesus, at the Temple, where the faithful saw the healed beggar praising God, and was the opportunity for some outstanding proselytising. Paul's first cure was clumsy and without apparent purpose, given that Paul did not tell the man about Jesus and he was even mistaken for a pagan god. Everything we seen in Acts portrays Paul as a lesser apostle.

What caused the Boston Tea Act?

The Tea Act, passed by Parliament on May 10, 1773, would launch the final spark to the revolutionary movement in Boston. The act was not intended to raise revenue in the American colonies, and in fact imposed no new taxes. It was designed to prop up the East India Company which was floundering financially and burdened with eighteen million pounds of unsold tea. This tea was to be shipped directly to the colonies, and sold at a bargain price. The Townshend Duties were still in place, however, and the radical leaders in America found reason to believe that this act was a maneuver to buy popular support for the taxes already in force. The direct sale of tea, via British agents, would also have undercut the business of local merchants. Colonists in Philadelphia and New York turned the tea ships back to Britain. In Charleston the cargo was left to rot on the docks. In Boston the Royal Governor was stubborn & held the ships in port, where the colonists would not allow them to unload. Cargoes of tea filled the harbor, and the British ship's crews were stalled in Boston looking for work and often finding trouble. This situation led to the Boston Tea Party.

What was the purpose of the Boston Port Act?

The Boston Port Act or Trade Act (one of the Intolerable Acts of 1774) was designed to punish the Massachusetts colony for its protests of British taxes, most notably with the Boston Tea Party of 1773. The act closed the port of Boston through a blockade by the Royal Navy. This was an attempt to coerce the repayment of customs and restitution to the East India Company for their lost revenue, and to re-exert British control of the colonies.

What did the Kansas Nebraska act lead to and why?

This arrangement for new states to vote on the slavery issue encouraged terrorists from both sides (including John Brown) to cross into the state, terrorise voters and cause chaos by declaring every result to be rigged. It was like a miniature version of the upcoming Civil War, and it foreshadowed the real thing.

Why was the Boston Port Act made?

WHEREAS dangerous commotions and insurrections have been fomented and raised in the town of Boston, in the province of Massachusetts Bay, in New England, by divers affected persons, to the subversion of his Majesty's government, and to the utter destruction of the public peace, and good order of the said town; in which commotions and insurrections certain valuable cargoes of teas, being the property of the East India Company, and on board certain vessels lying within the bay or harbor of Boston, were seized and destroyed: And whereas, in the present condition of the said town and harbor, the commerce of his Majesty's subjects cannot be safely carrie on there, nor the customs payable to his Majesty duly collected; and it is therefore expedient that the officers of his Majesty's customs should be forthwith removed from the said town... That from and after the first day of June , one thousand seven hundred and seventy-four, it shall not be lawful for any person or persons whatsoever to lade put, or cause or procure to be laden or put, off or from any quay, wharf, or other place, within the said town of Boston , or in or upon any part of the shore of the bay, commonly called The Harbour of Boston ... into any ship, vessel, lighter, boat, or bottom, any goods, wares, or merchandise whatsoever, to be transported or carried into any other country, province, or place whatsoever, or into any other part of the said province of the Massachusetts Bay, in New England ; or to take up, discharge, or lay on land, or cause or procure to be taken up, discharged, or laid on land, within the said town, or in or upon any of the places aforesaid, out of any boat, lighter, ship, vessel or bottom, any goods, wares, or merchandise whatsoever, to be brought from any other country, province, or place, or any other part of the said province of the Massachusetts Bay in New England , upon pain of the forfeiture of the said goods, wares, and merchandise, and of the sad boat, lighter, ship, vessel, or other bottom into which the same shall be put, or out of which the same shall be taken, and of the guns, ammunition, tackle, furniture, and stores, in or belonging to the same... IV. Provided always, That nothing in this act contained shall extend, or be construed to extend, to any military or other stores for his Majesty's use, or to the ships or vessels whereon the same shall be laden, which shall be commissioned by, and in the immediate pay of, his Majesty, his heirs or successors; nor to any fuel or victual brought coastwise from any part of the continent of America , for the necessary use and sustenance of the inhabitants of the said town of Boston ... X. Provided also, and it is hereby declared and enacted, That nothing herein contained shall extend, or be construed, to enable his Majesty to appoint such port, harbor, creeks, quays, wharfs, places, or officers, in the said town of Boston , or in the said bay or islands, until it shall sufficiently appear to his Majesty that full satisfaction hath been made by or on behalf of the inhabitants of the said town of Boston to the united company of merchants of England trading to the East Indies , for the damage sustained by the said company by the destruction of their goods sent to the said town of Boston , on board certain ships or vessels as aforesaid; and until it shall be certified to his Majesty, in council, by the governor, or lieutenant governor, of the said province, that reasonable satisfaction hath been made to the officers of his Majesty's revenue, and others, who suffered by the riots and insurrections above mentioned, in the months of November and December , in the year one thousand seven hundred and seventy-three, and in the month of January , in the year one thousand seven hundred and seventy-four.