The motorist is personally liable for all the damage.
Driving in an uninsured car has serious and expensive consequences.
You will receive a traffic violation. Your license can be suspended.
The police can tow and impound the vehicle. The vehicle can't be released until proof of insurance is procured. The impound fees add up quickly and the tow company can send your car to auction if the fees are not paid within the statutory time period for your state.
She becomes a pedestrian. Will also probably pay some hefty fines and repair bills.
Anyone without valid auto insurance that is driving is an uninsured motorist.
The at-fault driver's insurance will pay for all property and bodily injury damages.
If a person is driving a car and he/she is uninsured but the vehicle in which he is driving is registered and insured to another individual, the registered owner is liable for the damages to the other pwesond's vehicle.
Because there are many people who are driving without insurance coverage in our nation. Far more than you realize. It is a stupid and reckless crime but it happens all the time. If you do not have uninsured motorist coverage you will be on your own to try and collect your damages from someone who has chosen not to pay for legally required insurance. How well do you think you will do on collecting from this type of person. Plus the insurance company pays for the legal fees involved in getting judgements and collection.
The Property Damage coverage on the car you were driving should cover the damage to your own car. In the event that the car you were driving didn't have insurance coverage then you may be able to make a claim under your own Collision coverage or Uninsured Motorist Property Damage coverage could apply.
No. The car is insured and your son's policy will provide coverage up to its policy limits.
99% of all insurance companies will cover such situations.
No. Uninsured motorist coverage protects the owner of the vehicle which is damaged due to the actions of an uninsured driver of another vehicle (or damage caused by a hit-and-run driver). I think what you are asking is known as a 'permissive' driver - someone who was driving another person's vehicle with the owner's permission, but who is not actually named on the policy. The answer to this is 'probably' depending on the insurance company and the provisions of the policy itself, but if provided for would cover them like they were a named insured on the policy.
One of my family members was hit by a driver who carried insurance but was an "excluded" driver on the policy of the car she was driving. After talking to the other person's insurance company, an excluded driver is essentially equivalent to an uninsured motorist. That means that his/her insurance company will not represent them and that, if they are liable for the accident, your insurance company can go after them personally for the damages.
Since you are the only person with insurance it would be your insurance that pays, if your policy says this situation is covered. It depends on your insurance policy. Some cover you, others don't
No. Insurance follows the vehicle primary, driver secondary. Since the driver is at fault and there is no coverage under the vehicle itself, the drivers policy would pay for any bodily injury or property damage he may have caused. Therefore uninsured motorist coverage would not apply. The only way that driver would have coverage for himself is if he already had Med Pay coverage on his own policy.
Anyone driving in any state is required to be covered on the insurance policy of the vehicle they're operating, whether named on the policy, or covered by uninsured motorist coverage on that policy.