What would you like to do?
What happens to a petition for a writ of certiorari when it reaches the US Supreme Court?
In 2009, the US Supreme Court received 7,738 requests for case review, called a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. Because the volume of cases is so high, and there are only nine Justices on the Court, only 1-2% (75-150 cases) of the submitted petitions are granted certiorari.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
- When the Petition arrives, it goes into the Cert Pool, which is an electronic holding area for cases in need of review. Justices can opt in or out of the Cert Pool, meaning they can choose whether to participate in the initial round of reviews (older Justices sometimes choose to opt out, if the workload is too demanding).
- Each participating Justice places their clerks in the pool, and the clerks are randomly assigned cases to review and summarize. The assignment is designed to discourage clerks from selecting cases in which they have a particularly interest, to avoid the temptation of writing summaries in a way that skews the presentation or presents a bias.
- The Cert Pool, instituted in 1973 by the Burger Court, has been criticized as not being as ideologically neutral as intended, and for the fate of each Petition depending strongly on which particular clerk reads it.
- After the clerks summarize the Petitions, they circulate copies of their summaries to each of the nine Justices for review.
- The Justices meet privately in conference to discuss and vote on whether to accept briefs (more detailed information, lower court opinions, etc.). If at least four of the nine Justices vote to grant the petition, the case proceeds to the briefing stage; otherwise, certiorari is denied and the case ends.
- The results of the conference are published as orders of the Court, and those granted certiorari are scheduled for oral argument and placed on the docket.
- The justices issue a writ of certiorari, or order for the case files, to the lower court, and the Clerk of Court notifies the attorneys involved in the case of important dates and other requirements.
(End role of petition here)
- The attorneys for submit briefs and/or responses to opposing briefs.
- People and organizations with an interest in the case, but who are not parties to the case, may submit amicus (friend of the court) briefs providing opinions or additional information.
- The justices review all submitted legal material relevant to the case.
- The justices may hear oral arguments or conduct a paper review.
- The case is discussed in conference and the justices take a preliminary vote, and later, a final vote.
- One justice is assigned to write the opinion of the Court; other justices may choose to write concurring or dissenting opinions.
- The justices read and make suggestions about the written opinions.
- The decision is announced and published.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
37 people found this useful
Was this answer useful?
Thanks for the feedback!
You do not necessarily have to include "writ of" in a sentence. Here is an example of this term's use, taken from the American Library Association website (address follows t…he quote): "On Monday, October 29, 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari." On the other hand, "writ of" is often technically and grammatically correct, as in: "The defendant's attorney filed a petition for a writ of certiorari."
The Court has established rules governing its process and procedures, among these being Rule 10, which helps determine whether certiorari should be granted or denied. The Rule…s of the Supreme Court of the United States, adopted in February 2010, states the following: Rule 10. Considerations Governing Review on Writ of Certiorari "Review on a writ of certiorari is not a matter of right, but of judicial discretion. A petition for a writ of certiorari will be granted only for compelling reasons. The following, although neither controlling nor fully measuring the Court's discretion, indicate the character of the reasons the Court considers: (a) a United States court of appeals has entered a decision in conflict with the decision of another United States court of appeals on the same important matter; has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with a decision by a state court of last resort; or has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, or sanctioned such a departure by a lower court, as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power;(b) a state court of last resort has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with the decision of another state court of last resort or of a United States court of appeals;(c) a state court or a United States court of appeals has decided an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court, or has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of this Court. A petition for a writ of certiorari is rarely granted when the asserted error consists of erroneous factual findings or the misapplication of a properly stated rule of law." Most cases accepted on appeal involve decisions that conflict with the High Court's interpretation of the Constitution or federal law, or that the Justices believe need clarification in order to establish a precedent for application across all lower courts. Granting certiorari does not necessarily mean the Court disagrees with the final appellate court decision; there have been many instances in which those verdicts have been affirmed. Likewise, denying certiorari is not an indication that the Court agrees with the appellate court decision.
A petition for a writ of certiorari is supposed to be filed within 90 days of judgment entered from the last court of appeal, per rule 13 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of …the United States. The justices have discretion to extend the time by as many as 60 days, but rarely grant this permission. Rule 13. Review on Certiorari: Time for Petitioning Unless otherwise provided by law, a petition for a writ of certiorari to review a judgment in any case, civil or criminal, entered by a state court of last resort or a United States court of appeals (including the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces) is timely when it is ﬁled with the Clerk of this Court within 90 days after entry of the judgment. A petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of a judgment of a lower state court that is subject to discretionary review by the state court of last resort is timely when it is ﬁled with the Clerk within 90 days after entry of the order denying discretionary review. The Clerk will not ﬁle any petition for a writ of certiorari that is jurisdictionally out of time. See, e. g., 28 U. S. C. § 2101(c). The time to ﬁle a petition for a writ of certiorari runs from the date of entry of the judgment or order sought to be reviewed, and not from the issuance date of the mandate (or its equivalent under local practice). But if a petition for rehearing is timely ﬁled in the lower court by any party, or if the lower court appropriately entertains an untimely petition for rehearing or sua sponte considers rehearing, the time to ﬁle the petition for a writ of certiorari for all parties (whether or not they requested rehearing or joined in the petition for rehearing) runs from the date of the denial of rehearing or, if rehearing is granted, the subsequent entry of judgment. A cross-petition for a writ of certiorari is timely when it is ﬁled with the Clerk as provided in paragraphs 1, 3, and 5 of this Rule, or in Rule 12.5. However, a conditional cross-petition (which except for Rule 12.5 would be untimely) will not be granted unless another party's timely petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. For good cause, a Justice may extend the time to ﬁle a petition for a writ of certiorari for a period not exceeding 60 days. An application to extend the time to ﬁle shall set out the basis for jurisdiction in this Court, identify the judgment sought to be reviewed, include a copy of the opinion and any order respecting rehearing, and set out speciﬁc reasons why an extension of time is justiﬁed. The application must be ﬁled with the Clerk at least 10 days before the date the petition is due, except in extraordinary circumstances. For the time and manner of presenting the application, see Rules 21, 22, 30, and 33.2. An application to extend the time to ﬁle a petition for a writ of certiorari is not favored. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
"On writ of certiorari to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit" means the US Supreme Court has issued a writ of certiorari, or an order for the named court to send th…e records of a particular case, to the Supreme Court because the Court has granted a petitioner's request for appeal. The Ninth Circuit is the appellate Circuit that reviews cases originating in District (trial) Courts for the following areas: District of Alaska District of Arizona Central District of California Eastern District of California Northern District of California Southern District of California District of Hawaii District of Idaho District of Montana District of Nevada District of Oregon Eastern District of Washington Western District of Washington District Court of Guam United States District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands
The percentage of petitions for writ of certiorari denied is ~ 98-99%. The US Supreme Court received 7,738 petitions for writ of certiorari in each the 2008-2009 and 2009-201…0 Terms, granted certiorari in fewer than 200 in the 2008-09 Term, and issued written opinions on only 83 cases. The statistical estimate for denial of cert is 98-99%. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Is there a case cite where a pro se litigant filed for a Writ of Certiorari to the US Supreme Court to overturn an Oregon court decision on judicial disqualification?
An extensive database search of petitions and cases reviewed by the SCOTUS revealed no documents that met all of the following criteria: * Petition to US Supreme Court …for Writ of Certiorari * Supreme Court of Oregon or Oregon Supreme Court or US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit * Appellant or Petitioner pro se * Judicial disqualification or recusal or recuse The closest match was Baldwin v. Reese, 541 US 27 (2004), certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit (282 F.3d 1184). Baldwin v. Reese (2004) Michael Reese was convicted of kidnapping and attempted sodomy in the state of Oregon and sentenced to 33 years in prison. He received court-appointed counsel who unsuccessfully filed appeals and requests for post-conviction relief through the state courts. After the lower courts denied him collateral relief, Reese filed a pro se petition for review in the Oregon Supreme Court, claiming, among other things, "ineffective assistance of appellate counsel," "imprisonment in violation of State law," and that his trial counsel's conduct had "violated several provisions of the Federal Constitution." The Oregon Supreme Court declined to review the case. Reese next filed a writ of habeas corpus in Federal District Court. The Court held that he had not "fairly presented" his claim of ineffective counsel in the state judiciary, and thus did not yet have standing in the federal courts. The U.S. Court of Appeal for the 9th Circuit reversed the district court ruling, declaring that Reese had, indeed, "fairly presented" his claim, despite expressing an opinion that the brief had been inadequately prepared, because the Oregon Supreme Court had "the opportunity to read . . . the lower [Oregon] court decision claimed to be in error before deciding whether to grant discretionary review." George Baldwin, Superintendent, Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution, petitioned the US Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, which it granted to determine whether the 9th Circuit had correctly interpreted the "fair presentation" requirement. The Rehnquist Court voted to reverse the 9th Circuit's ruling, 8-1, with Justice Stevens dissenting. Justice Breyer delivered the majority opinion, which began with an acknowledgment that Reese's petition, by itself, would not have alerted the Oregon Supreme Court to the federal nature of his claim. He went on to address the error in the 9th Circuit's reasoning: "We recognize that the justices of the Oregon Supreme Court did have an "opportunity" to read the lower court opinions in Reese's case. That opportunity means that the judges could have read them. But to say that a petitioner "fairly presents" a federal claim when an appellate judge can discover that claim only by reading lower court opinions in the case is to say that those judges must read the lower court opinions--for otherwise they would forfeit the State's opportunity to decide that federal claim in the first instance. In our view, federal habeas corpus law does not impose such a requirement." and "For these reasons, we believe that the requirement imposed by the Ninth Circuit would unjustifiably undercut the considerations of federal-state comity that the exhaustion requirement seeks to promote. We consequently hold that ordinarily a state prisoner does not "fairly present" a claim to a state court if that court must read beyond a petition or a brief (or a similar document) that does not alert it to the presence of a federal claim in order to find material, such as a lower court opinion in the case, that does so." The Supreme Court declined to address the case on its merits, instead reversing and remanding to the lower courts. * Attorney Dennis Balske argued the cause for Reese.
A petition for a writ of certiorari is a formal document sent to the US Supreme Court that requests the Court review a case on appeal from the highest appellate court (usually…) with jurisdiction over the case. Either party may file the petition, although the most recent losing party is usually the one to make such request. Petitioners whose appeal was rejected by the US Court of Appeals Circuit Court or State Supreme Court are also eligible to file. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
You could file a petition for reconsideration; however, this is unlikely to be successful. Typically, when the US Supreme Court denies certiorari, the decision of the last app…ellate court to rule on the case becomes final, and the matter is considered res judicata (legally concluded).
In cases that reach the Supreme Court on certiorari does the Petitioner bring the case against the Respondent?
Yes. The Petitioner (or Appellant) brings his or her case against the Respondent (or Appellee). The Petitioner is the one who files a petition for a writ of certiorari. … Usually, this means the Petitioner lost in the intermediate Court of Appeals, but there have been occasional instances where the winning party files first, in anticipation of the decision being challenged. This strategy is sometimes employed because the Petitioner gets to present his (or her) case first, and may reserve a portion of his allotted 30 minutes for rebuttal after the Respondent has argued. Having an opportunity to rebut the opponent's argument can present a significant advantage.
Most petitions for Writ of Certiorari are denied. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The US Supreme Court received 7,738 petitions for Writ of Certiorari (requests for case review) in 2008 (the most recent year for which statistics are available). This represe…nts about a 20% increase over the number of cases submitted a decade earlier, and 234% more than the 2,313 the Court received in 1960. According to Court literature, the justices hear oral arguments for approximately 100 cases per Term, and issue full opinions for 75-85 of those. They write orders for another 50-60 cases reviewed without argument. The Supreme Court estimates the justices generate approximately 5,000 pages of written opinions each Term. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Granted certiorari (accepted for review, and the case records ordered from the lower courts).
Yes, of course it's legal to petition the US Supreme Court. When discussing Supreme Court cases, it's important to realize "petition" means to file an appeal of a case already… decided by the lower courts. It does not mean to send a signature petition in protest or support of a decision. You are within your legal rights to send such a document, but the Court is not required to read it.
can Cases reach the Supreme Court through certificate and writ of certiorari.
there can never be a tie. there are 9 people on the supreme court. everyone has to vote. there will never be a tie. there will always be a majority for one judgement.
It's unclear what is being asked. If you wish to see a copy of the order of Cert that was issued in a case, it should be filed in the court case file - a public record. If yo…u are asking how to submit such a writ - you can't. A writ of certiorari is an order issued by a higher court in order to review the decision and proceedings in a lower court and determine whether there were any irregularities. While an individual may appeal their case to the appelate level, an individual themselves cannot issue a Writ of Cert. It can only be issued by the higher level court, NOT an indiviudual .