What would you like to do?
What happens to a petition for a writ of certiorari when it reaches the US Supreme Court?
In 2009, the US Supreme Court received 7,738 requests for case review, called a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. Because the volume of cases is so high, and there are only nine Justices on the Court, only 1-2% (75-150 cases) of the submitted petitions are granted certiorari.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
- When the Petition arrives, it goes into the Cert Pool, which is an electronic holding area for cases in need of review. Justices can opt in or out of the Cert Pool, meaning they can choose whether to participate in the initial round of reviews (older Justices sometimes choose to opt out, if the workload is too demanding).
- Each participating Justice places their clerks in the pool, and the clerks are randomly assigned cases to review and summarize. The assignment is designed to discourage clerks from selecting cases in which they have a particularly interest, to avoid the temptation of writing summaries in a way that skews the presentation or presents a bias.
- The Cert Pool, instituted in 1973 by the Burger Court, has been criticized as not being as ideologically neutral as intended, and for the fate of each Petition depending strongly on which particular clerk reads it.
- After the clerks summarize the Petitions, they circulate copies of their summaries to each of the nine Justices for review.
- The Justices meet privately in conference to discuss and vote on whether to accept briefs (more detailed information, lower court opinions, etc.). If at least four of the nine Justices vote to grant the petition, the case proceeds to the briefing stage; otherwise, certiorari is denied and the case ends.
- The results of the conference are published as orders of the Court, and those granted certiorari are scheduled for oral argument and placed on the docket.
- The justices issue a writ of certiorari, or order for the case files, to the lower court, and the Clerk of Court notifies the attorneys involved in the case of important dates and other requirements.
(End role of petition here)
- The attorneys for submit briefs and/or responses to opposing briefs.
- People and organizations with an interest in the case, but who are not parties to the case, may submit amicus (friend of the court) briefs providing opinions or additional information.
- The justices review all submitted legal material relevant to the case.
- The justices may hear oral arguments or conduct a paper review.
- The case is discussed in conference and the justices take a preliminary vote, and later, a final vote.
- One justice is assigned to write the opinion of the Court; other justices may choose to write concurring or dissenting opinions.
- The justices read and make suggestions about the written opinions.
- The decision is announced and published.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
3 people found this useful
Was this answer useful?
Thanks for the feedback!
A writ of certiorari is the Supreme Court's equivalent of anappeals case in lower courts. In this process four of nine SupremeCourt justices must agree that there is sufficien…t evidence to hearthe case. If they do agree to go forward, a writ of certiorari isthen created.
At least four of the nine Justices of the Supreme Court must agree to grant a petition for a writ of certiorari. This is called the rule of four. Conversely, five votes are re…quired to determine the outcome of a case after it is heard.
How many Supreme Court justices must vote in favor of a writ of certiorari for the Court to issue one?
4 Four of the nine justices must vote to grant a writ of certiorari (the so-called Rule of Four). Only a fraction of the petitions submitted to the Supreme Court will be acc…epted; approximately 7500 petitions are presented each year and somewhere between 80 and 150 are granted.
Yes. Due to the volume of petitions, the Supreme Court denies 98-99% of them.
The US Supreme Court received 7,738 petitions for Writ of Certiorari (requests for case review) in 2008 (the most recent year for which statistics are available). This represe…nts about a 20% increase over the number of cases submitted a decade earlier, and 234% more than the 2,313 the Court received in 1960. According to Court literature, the justices hear oral arguments for approximately 100 cases per Term, and issue full opinions for 75-85 of those. They write orders for another 50-60 cases reviewed without argument. The Supreme Court estimates the justices generate approximately 5,000 pages of written opinions each Term. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The percentage of petitions for writ of certiorari denied is ~ 98-99%. The US Supreme Court received 7,738 petitions for writ of certiorari in each the 2008-2009 and 2009-201…0 Terms, granted certiorari in fewer than 200 in the 2008-09 Term, and issued written opinions on only 83 cases. The statistical estimate for denial of cert is 98-99%. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
A plaintiff or defendant in a federal court case (or in a state court case where a Federal Constitutional issue is in dispute ) who wants to appeal to the Supreme Court of the… United States may ask for a writ of certiorari. The U.S. Supreme Court is obligated to take certain cases on appeal (for example, capital murder cases) but has discretion to take or not take certain others. The writ of certiorari is the Supreme Court's written agreement to take one of those discretionary cases on appeal.
If the U.S. Supreme Court denies a petition for a writ of certiorari (a request to hear a case on appeal), then the decision of the lower court is final. Denial of certiorar…i occurs in 98-99% of cases, and in no way implies that the court agrees with the lower court's decision. Denial only means that the case, as presented, isn't of sufficient importance to warrant a review, doesn't involve constitutional issues, conforms to a precedent already set, falls outside the court's jurisdiction, or is moot, etc. Between 7,500 and 8,500 cases are presented for review each year, but the court can only choose 80-150 to hear, so the Justices have to limit themselves to those cases that have the greatest impact on the law and on society.
A petition for a writ of certiorari is supposed to be filed within 90 days of judgment entered from the last court of appeal, per rule 13 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of …the United States. The justices have discretion to extend the time by as many as 60 days, but rarely grant this permission. Rule 13. Review on Certiorari: Time for Petitioning Unless otherwise provided by law, a petition for a writ of certiorari to review a judgment in any case, civil or criminal, entered by a state court of last resort or a United States court of appeals (including the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces) is timely when it is ﬁled with the Clerk of this Court within 90 days after entry of the judgment. A petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of a judgment of a lower state court that is subject to discretionary review by the state court of last resort is timely when it is ﬁled with the Clerk within 90 days after entry of the order denying discretionary review. The Clerk will not ﬁle any petition for a writ of certiorari that is jurisdictionally out of time. See, e. g., 28 U. S. C. § 2101(c). The time to ﬁle a petition for a writ of certiorari runs from the date of entry of the judgment or order sought to be reviewed, and not from the issuance date of the mandate (or its equivalent under local practice). But if a petition for rehearing is timely ﬁled in the lower court by any party, or if the lower court appropriately entertains an untimely petition for rehearing or sua sponte considers rehearing, the time to ﬁle the petition for a writ of certiorari for all parties (whether or not they requested rehearing or joined in the petition for rehearing) runs from the date of the denial of rehearing or, if rehearing is granted, the subsequent entry of judgment. A cross-petition for a writ of certiorari is timely when it is ﬁled with the Clerk as provided in paragraphs 1, 3, and 5 of this Rule, or in Rule 12.5. However, a conditional cross-petition (which except for Rule 12.5 would be untimely) will not be granted unless another party's timely petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. For good cause, a Justice may extend the time to ﬁle a petition for a writ of certiorari for a period not exceeding 60 days. An application to extend the time to ﬁle shall set out the basis for jurisdiction in this Court, identify the judgment sought to be reviewed, include a copy of the opinion and any order respecting rehearing, and set out speciﬁc reasons why an extension of time is justiﬁed. The application must be ﬁled with the Clerk at least 10 days before the date the petition is due, except in extraordinary circumstances. For the time and manner of presenting the application, see Rules 21, 22, 30, and 33.2. An application to extend the time to ﬁle a petition for a writ of certiorari is not favored. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The petition follows a standard format that allows Supreme Court Justices to review each case efficiently. The composition of the Petition includes the following: A cover p…age identifying the Petition, the Petitioner and Respondent (or Appellee and Appellant), from which Circuit Court of Appeals the case originates, and name(s) and address(es) of the Petitioner's counsel.Questions Presented (A brief statement of which Constitutional questions arise from the case)Rule 29.6 statement if either party is a corporation (states parent corporation, whether a publicly held company is part owner)Table of ContentsTable of Authorities (cases used to cite precedent)Opinions Below (Ruling of Appeals Court)Jurisdiction Constitutional Provision Involved (cites specific language)Statement (summary of case, including background and prior rulings)Reasons for granting petition (why the case is worthy of the Supreme Court's time)Occurrences (appears to address similar issues the court has ruled on)The decision below is incorrect (legal theory for why the appeals court made the wrong decision)The decision below conflicts with others (cases where other federal appeals courts, or the same court in other instances, rendered a verdict that conflicts with the verdict on appeal)ConclusionName(s) and address(es) of Petitioner's counsel For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Clarence Earl Gideon was arrested and charged with petty theft, a felony carrying prison time in the state of Florida. At trial, Gideon, who was indigent and barely literate, …requested the court uphold his Sixth Amendment rights and appoint counsel to represent him. The state court, acting under the color of Betts v. Brady, (1942), refused on the grounds that the state only appointed counsel in capital (death penalty) cases. Gideon defended himself as best he could, but was no match for the law-school educated prosecutor, was convicted, and received a sentence of five years. From prison, Gideon wrote a petition for writ of habeas corpus and submitted it to the Florida Supreme Court. The Court denied relief. Gideon next turned to the prison library, and carefully constructed a handwritten petition for writ of certiorari to the US Supreme Court. The Court granted certiorari and promptly appointed future US Supreme Court justice Abe Fortas to represent Gideon before the Court. The Court's decision to grant certiorari could be considered surprising for several reasons: Gideon was proceeding pro se (representing himself). He was uneducated and barely literate. He prepared his brief using resources in the prison library. His petition to the Court was handwritten. The Court's decision allowing states to restrict which cases (other than capital offenses) qualified for court-appointed counsel, in Betts v. Brady, (1942), was fairly recent and was accepted precedent. In other respects, the Court's decision to grant certiorari was less than surprising: Gideon petitioned the Warren Court, which was progressive and proactive about incorporating the first eight amendments of the Bill of Rights to the states. Betts v. Brady was a decision of an earlier Court. Justice Hugo Black, then a member of the Court, was a vocal supporter of total incorporation (applying the entire Bill of Rights to the states at one time) and had persuaded a number of other justices to his way of thinking. Although the Court was proceeding with selective incorporation (applying individual clauses within amendments as they became relevant to cases before the court), the justices were undoubtedly looking for ripe cases that allowed them to advance incorporation as quickly as possible. The Warren Court took a special interest in safeguarding the constitutional rights of the accused. Gideon's handwritten petition, mailed from prison, represented a compelling example of the problems faced by indigent pro se defendants without formal legal training or advanced education. If you analyze Gideon's petition in terms of protocol and sound legal writing, it's easy to consider the Supreme Court's decision to grant cert as a near-miracle. However, if you consider the context of the era, the Warren Court's agenda, and the compelling nature of a desperate man approaching the Court with a handwritten and earnest, but flawed, legal brief, it's much easier to understand how these circumstances actually improved his chance of being heard. The case citation is Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963) For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Writ of Certiorari use to keep judicial body and administrative tribunal within it's limit, when inferior court hear a mater over which it has no jurisdiction, then Writ of ce…rtiorari issued to quash the such order or decision.
You do not necessarily have to include "writ of" in a sentence. Here is an example of this term's use, taken from the American Library Association website (address follows t…he quote): "On Monday, October 29, 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari." On the other hand, "writ of" is often technically and grammatically correct, as in: "The defendant's attorney filed a petition for a writ of certiorari."
A petition for a writ of certiorari is a formal document sent to the US Supreme Court that requests the Court review a case on appeal from the highest appellate court (usually…) with jurisdiction over the case. Either party may file the petition, although the most recent losing party is usually the one to make such request. Petitioners whose appeal was rejected by the US Court of Appeals Circuit Court or State Supreme Court are also eligible to file. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
When the US Supreme Court issues a writ of certiorari (an order to the lower court to send up records), it indicates they have agreed to review the case under their appellate …jurisdiction.
can Cases reach the Supreme Court through certificate and writ of certiorari.
The US Supreme Court received 7,738 petitions for Writ of Certiorari (requests for case review) in the 2008-2009 Term (the most recent year for which information is available)…. The Court estimated it had received more than 10,000 petitions last Term, but the number was revised downward in the Chief Justice's year-end report. This represents about a 6.1% decrease in the number of cases submitted for the 2007-2008 Term, but 234.5% more than the 2,313 the Court received in 1960. Due to limitations on the amount of work a nine-Justice Court can handle, only 1-2% of these petitions are granted. The Court typically hears between 75-100 cases per year, and sometimes has to carry a case forward until the following year's docket.