0
1. Everything has a functionthat it alone can do or that ir does better than anything else (ergon)
2. The virtue/ experience of a thing is that property that enables it to perform its function well (arete)
3.The function of the soul is living
4.From (2) and (3), the virtue of the soul is whatever enables it to perform its function well.
5. Justice is the virtue of the soul
6. Therefore from (5) and (6), a just person will live well and an unjust person will live badly
7. Therefore a just person is happy
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Socrates' function argument states that the function of a thing is what it alone can do or do best. This argument is used to support the idea that living virtuously is the highest good for humans, as it is what distinguishes us as rational beings. By performing our function well, we achieve eudaimonia, or a state of flourishing and fulfillment.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Example of a line of reasoning that presents a deductive argument?
All humans are mortal. Socrates is a human. Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
Crito was unable to keep control of the argument because?
Socrates used his method of questioning to undermine Crito's arguments and challenge his assumptions. Socrates employed logic and reason to expose inconsistencies in Crito's reasoning, making it difficult for Crito to maintain control of the argument. Additionally, Socrates' conviction and commitment to his beliefs made it challenging for Crito to sway him to a different perspective.
All men are mortal Socrates was mortal therefore all men are Socrates expect 1?
The argument is logically flawed. While it is true that all men are mortal and Socrates was mortal, it does not follow that all men are Socrates. This conclusion is incorrect.
Socrates' unexpected response to the argument leaves Crito Choose the best response?
Socrates' unexpected response to the argument shows his commitment to following moral principles rather than fleeing from unjust punishment. Crito must now decide if he should respect Socrates' decision to accept his fate or try to help him escape.
What are the horns of dilemma that Socrates presents to Meletus?
Socrates presents Meletus with a dilemma by questioning whether he believes that Socrates corrupts the youth intentionally or unintentionally. If Meletus answers that it's intentional, then Socrates wouldn't harm his own soul intentionally. If he answers unintentional, then there would be no need for punishment. This creates a contradiction in Meletus's argument.
Socrates' teaching was revolutionary because he taught by means of?
Socrates' teaching was revolutionary because he used a method known as the Socratic method, which involved asking thought-provoking questions to stimulate critical thinking and self-reflection in his students. Rather than providing direct answers, he led them to discover knowledge and insights on their own.
Socrates' unexpected response to the argument leaves Crito?
Socrates leaves Crito after giving an unexpected response to his argument because he remains steadfast in his belief that it is never right to do wrong. He believes that escaping from prison, even though unjustly convicted, would go against his principles and the laws of the state.
How are crito and Socrates argument different?
Crito says to do what people think is right, but Socrates says you must do what you think is right
How did Socrates keep an upper hand in the argument?
Socrates kept an upper hand in arguments by using a method of questioning known as the Socratic method. He would ask probing questions to expose contradictions in his opponent's arguments and lead them to a deeper understanding of the issue at hand. This approach often left his opponents feeling unsure and ultimately led to the uncovering of underlying truths.
How did Socrates keep in upper hand in the argument?
By responding in unexpected ways
What are the parts of a deductive argument?
A deductive argument consists of a premise (a statement assumed to be true) and a conclusion (a statement inferred from the premises). The premise provides evidence or reasons to support the conclusion, which must necessarily follow from the premises if they are true. Deductive arguments aim to demonstrate the logical necessity of the conclusion based on the premises provided.
What is the main difference between crito's and socrates's argument?
crito says to do what people think is right,but socrates says you must do what you think is right
Which best explains how the argument of crito and socrates are different?
Crito says to do what people think is right, but Socrates says you must do what you think is right.
Crito was unable to keep control of the argument because?
Socrates used his method of questioning to undermine Crito's arguments and challenge his assumptions. Socrates employed logic and reason to expose inconsistencies in Crito's reasoning, making it difficult for Crito to maintain control of the argument. Additionally, Socrates' conviction and commitment to his beliefs made it challenging for Crito to sway him to a different perspective.
Why isn't justice paying your debts as cephalus says according to socrates?
Socrates argues that justice is more than simply paying one's debts; it involves acting virtuously and treating others fairly. He suggests that true justice is a deeper principle that encompasses the moral character of a person, not just their financial obligations. In this way, Socrates challenges the conventional notion of justice proposed by Cephalus.
When Socrates asks an audience to believe an obvious argument that can be supported by facts he is?
relying on logic.
What words are related to Socrates?
Elenchus. It's another word for the Socratic Method of argument through questions.
