No such thing. It is a contradiction in terms. They are opposites.
By most accounts, there is no such thing as an authoritarian democracy, since, by definition, democracies and authoritarian regimes are dichotomous.
I agree that most of the worlds governments are republics but for how many are democracies, I think only half of these countries are democracies. note: Sudan is a republic but it is mostly authoritarian. So was Egypt before the Arab Spring. Many African countries are republics but they are dominated by just one party.
revolutionary and authoritarian regimes and resistance to european imperialism, interanl political in european.;
revolutionary and authoritarian regimes and resistance to european Imperialism, interanl political in european.;
revolutionary and authoritarian regimes and resistance to european Imperialism, interanl political in european.;
Authoritarianism and democracy are not fundamentally opposed to one another, it is thus definitely possible for democracies to possess strong authoritarian elements, for both feature a form of submission to authority.
Autocratic.Though the question is in error, democratic countries are not Libertarian. In fact, there has never been a Libertarian country in History.Most "democracies" today could be defined as Neo-liberal.
There seems to have been a deep-seated yearning for a 'strong man', a loathing of democratic politicians (parliamentarians) and an utter horror of Bolshevism.
Authoritarian. Democracies are limited by a constitution and held accountable to the people. In authoritarian rule, those in power hold absolute authority over the people, although other institutions may operate independently of the government.
Israel and Turkey both became functional parliamentary democracies at roughly the same time 1949-1950. (Prior to this the Republic of Turkey was an authoritarian republic.)
authoritarian
How is he an Authoritarian? He does not have the court order!