Birth weight in human babies is one good example. Too small and babies lose heat rapidly and are also prone to infectious disease. Too large and they endanger themselves and their mothers by the great difficulty they have passing through the birth canal. So, a small range of birth weights have been selected for and this remains stabilized by the constraints listed above.
A common cause of stabilizing selection Heterozygotes are fittest.
When natural selection favors the intermediate version of a characteristic, it is referred to as stabilizing selection. It is the opposite of disruptive selection.
Stabilizing selection
Stabilizing selection.
That would be the Stabilizing Selection where there will me not a lot of genetic variation. The curve of the population allele frequency would be quite thin with the extreme being in the middle.
stabilizing selection
When natural selection favors the intermediate version of a characteristic, it is referred to as stabilizing selection. It is the opposite of disruptive selection.
directional selection,stabilizing selection, anddisruptiveselection
That is the definition of stabilizing selection.
Stabilizing selection
Stabilizing selection results in less genetic diversity in a population.
disruptive selection
Directional selection
Directional Selection - APEX
Stabilizing selection.
It is against an extreme phenotypes arising in a population of organisms. Height in humans is under stabilizing selection so that the normally distributed height of humans, save some outliers, describes the standard Bell curve.
Stabilizing selection.
stabilizing selection