What would you like to do?
What is the basis of grammaticality?
The rules of how words are combined to form a sentence.
Grammatical accuracy is obtained when each word in a sentence represents the meaning the author intents to convey and are arrange in the correct order.
Grammatical competence is the ability 1. to recognize and produce the distinctive grammatical structures of a language and to use them effectively in communication. 2…. to use the forms of the language (sounds, words, and sentence structure). Discussion Grammatical competence as defined by Noam Chomsky would include phonological competence. Grammatical competence is the primary focus of study in most academic language courses. Most scholars agree that there is some kind of fundamental difference between being able to use the forms of the language and being able to talk about the forms of the language: the relationship between those two kinds of knowledge is a controversial topic!
The word "the" is what is known as an "article."
They help to bring the text in light and understandable form. In some cases we just have to use grammatical transformations.
well formed; in accordance with the productive rules of grammar of the language
You may say "I had no pencil," or you may say "I did not have any pencils" - whichever feels more natural to you. "Had no" would be used when speaking of a singular subject …however.
defination of grammatical weight
Both are correct, with different meaning. If I was introduces a real condition in the past, and if I were introduces an unreal condition in the present. For example: If I was …hungry I ate and If I were hungry I would eat
You're using the predicate nominative, so the pronoun should technically be in the nominative case (i.e. "If you were I"), but English speakers almost universally say and writ…e "If you were me." "If you were I" sounds very stilted and many grammarians concede that the rule is changing.
Yes, it could be, for example in the sentence 'I am tired of all this arguing, as are you.'
The correct grammar is YOU AND I if used as a subject, e.g. ""You & I will have a jolly good time". Correct grammar requires YOU AND ME if used as an object, e.g. "This is jus…t between you and me" "I" designates a subject and "me" designates an object.
More perfect. Perfect is an absolute. You cannot be more perfect. "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domest…ic Tranquility" - It should read "ensure", nothing is being insured.
Yes, it is incorrect. Even though the pronoun "you" can be singular or plural, it is ALWAYS used with a plural verb! The verb "was" is singular, so that is incorrect.
"What I did is" is correct. It does not matter that the doing occurred in the past: it is still what I did, and will always be what I did. The answer below represents a very p…opular misuse of tenses. You are talking about something you did in the past, because you are using "did", therefore the correct statement is, "What I did was..." If you were to use the verb "is" or "to be" then that means you are speaking about the present, so the correct statement using this verb is "What I am doing is..."
Yes, in context as the subject. Example: You and he are friends, BUT not as the object; the correct objective is: They saw you and him talking together