When an Indian who has lived outside India for a reasonable period of time writes, it is the former. When an Indian living in India writes in English it is the latter. The place of residence naturally affects the way one writes, the language one uses etc.
The answer sums up about everything. The styles change with the experiences one have been through. So generally Indian diaspora write about their sense of displacement, their lives etc. While Indian Writing in English is Indian who have adopted English as a medium to write books.
Diaspora Indian writing in English refers to literature written by Indians living outside of India, often exploring themes of displacement and cultural identity. Indian writing in English typically refers to literature written by authors residing in India, reflecting a diverse range of regional and cultural influences. Both types of writing contribute to the rich tapestry of Indian literature in English.
While I'm not familiar with the two forms of writing referenced in the question, I believe I can extrapolate an answer. Take a look at the two different descriptors here: diaspora and expatriate. While both terms imply removal from one's native country, diaspora gives more the sense of being driven out, and expatriate lends itself more to a self-motivated migration. By and large there should be no discernible difference between the two based on the labels. Any differences are likely the result of the source, the writers themselves.
what is the difference between subjective and objective writing
It looks like Portuguese because it is Portuguese. The difference between the Portuguese spoken in Portugal and the one in Brazil is more or less the same as the difference existing between UK English and USA English (in the same order).
History is the study of past events, people, and civilizations. English is the study and application of the English language, such as grammer, puncuation, vocab, and the style of writing.
ya he can try coz i think there is a vasi difference between speaking and writing English
Cuneiform writing was used by ancient Mesopotamian civilizations and was characterized by wedge-shaped symbols pressed into clay tablets. Phoenician writing, on the other hand, evolved into the modern alphabet and was more linear and simplified compared to cuneiform. The Phoenician alphabet later became the basis for many other writing systems including Greek and Latin.
The difference between technical writing and composition writing is that the technical writing deals with writing off on the basis of rules that must be thoroughly proofread, while composition writing deals with writing from your imagination, with no guidelines or rules.
The putting of the Talmud into writing.
Same thing as far as I know. Wrote the test that had been reffered as presi (english summary) test.
Chinese writing is a logographic system where characters represent words or phrases, while cuneiform is a script made up of wedge-shaped characters used in ancient Mesopotamia. Chinese characters are primarily used in East Asia, while cuneiform was used in the ancient Near East.
Nothing, the difference is in the author's style of writing
Nothing differs From the Writing Company