An electoral democracy is a state whose government is technically determined by popular sovereignty. In other words, people within that country decide who will govern them, or have the right and ability to vote. Many times, however, democracies are democratic in name only. Elections may be rigged or there may be no real political competition or opposition party. A liberal democracy is one in which both popular sovereignty and liberty are present. Civil liberties place restraints on government. These restraints often come in the form of civil society or institutions that are created to monitor governments and keep them from getting too powerful. A substantive democracy is a functioning democracy. For example, democracy in the US is a representative kind: American citizens elect people to represent them in government and to create legislature. A direct democracy is a New England town meeting sort, in which people vote directly on every matter which concerns them. This is not particularly feasible at a large, national level.
They are the same thing. Substantive Democracy has all the institutions like freedom of the press, free expression of ideas, protection of property, etc that the classical liberal democracy guys like Locke were all about.
Procedural democracy emphasizes to the functioning system of law making bodies and political instituions like elcetion procedure, election commission, legislative assembly etc. But substantive democracy emphasizes public particiopation of all gruops in political activities in election with procedural democarcy.
An electoral democracy is a state whose government is technically determined by popular sovereignty. In other words, people within that country decide who will govern them, or have the right and ability to vote. Many times, however, democracies are democratic in name only. Elections may be rigged or there may be no real political competition or opposition party. A liberal democracy is one in which both popular sovereignty and liberty are present. Civil liberties place restraints on government. These restraints often come in the form of civil society or institutions that are created to monitor governments and keep them from getting too powerful. A substantive democracy is a functioning democracy. For example, democracy in the US is a representative kind: American citizens elect people to represent them in government and to create legislature. A direct democracy is a New England town meeting sort, in which people vote directly on every matter which concerns them. This is not particularly feasible at a large, national level.
Procedural defenses focus on the process of the legal case, such as lack of jurisdiction or improper service of process, and can result in the case being dismissed without addressing the merits. Substantive defenses address the actual legal arguments of the case, such as statute of limitations or lack of evidence, and seek to show that the plaintiff's claim is without merit.
camp
the popular vote is by everybody. the electoral vote is by electoral colleges, which not everyone is in
difference between good governac and democracy
The difference is simply that totalitarianism regime is 2 words and democracy is 1 word
Procedural due process deals with governmental methods and how they are used, whereas substantive due process deals with the fairness of laws.
communist ruled by military democracy "governed" by the people
democracy people have power,dictatarship one person has power
They are not comparable. The Roman Republic was an oligarchy, not a democracy.
The difference is that development means "desenvolvimento" and is a substantive and the word developing in portuguese is adverb that means "desenvolvendo".