What would you like to do?
What is the difference between loose construction and strict construction of the constitution?
Strict construction meant that those interpreting it thought that that the government should only have powers that were expressly stated in the constitution. Like, it shouldn't stretch the limits or try to do things that the constitution didn't say specifically were ok to do.
2 people found this useful
Was this answer useful?
Thanks for the feedback!
Legal philosophy of judicial interpretation.
Tariffs on imports.
Creating a national bank represented a "loose" construction of the Constitution.
Loose construction-means that the federal government can take reasonable actions that the constitution does not specifically forbid Strict construction- people who favor… strict constitution think that that federal government should do only what the constitution specifically says it can do The Loose Construction Theory is when federalists interpret the Constitution into things that are in favor of a stronger national government. There are limitations involved.
A strict interpretation of the Constitution states that the government of the United States holds only those powers specifically granted to it by the Constitution. … A loose interpretation of the Constitution posits that the government of the United States hold all powers that are not specifically denied to it by the Constitution.
Strict construction is a legal philosophy of judicial interpretation in which the original intent of the constitution holds that the Constitution means exactly what it says, a…nd thus, is not open to interpretation or inference. This legal philosophy is sometimes called "judicial conservatism." In addition, strict constructionalism stemmed from Thomas Jefferson and other anti-federalists, who believed that since the United States government's powers are derived from the consent of the governed then the people or the States should restrict the Supreme Court's power. In other words, a judge should strictly look at the constitution and if it does not answer the problem at hand, then it should be up to the states to decide. Loose construction is based on the idea that the Founding Fathers could not have foreseen what the world would be like in the 21st Century, and that the Constitution must thus be interpreted in light of historic and societal change. Loose constructionism is sometimes called "judicial liberalism."
Yes hamilton believed in a strict construction of the constitution
Yes. Not only construction, but also loose interpretation.
It's your interpretation of the constitution. The philosophy that allows narrow constitutional interpretation is called strict construction and the philosophy of broad constit…utional interpretation is called loose construction. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison favored the strict constructions, and Alexander Hamilton favored the loose construction.
The democratic-republican party wanted strict construction of the constitution.
That you believe you can do anything that the constitution does not specifically forbid.
Strict construction takes a narrow view of laws, statutes, and the constitution. Broad construction takes a broad view of laws, statutes, and the constitution.
No. Jefferson believed in the exact opposite. He believed that if the Constitution were given too much power, the government would quickly become oppressive. In his mind, a lo…ose construction would give people in power the authority to invent whatever powers they wanted for themselves and claim that it was "implied" in the Constitution. He was originally against a Constitution at all, believing that power was much safer in the hands of the individual states than one all-encompassing central government. Once he lost that battle, he fought for strict construction and a Bill of Rights to guarantee individual freedoms.
The federalists were those in the colonies that believed in a loose construction of the United States' Constitution. This group felt that with a stricter constitution thei…r rights and liberties would be jeopardized and all power would lie within the government.
What is The difference between the implied powers view of the constitution as to compared to loose construction view?
Implied powers are powers not specifically listed in the Constitution of the United States, but which the national government needs in order to carry out the expressed (…strict) powers listed in the Constitution. Loose Construction is basically the same thing. A loose or liberal interpretation of the Constitution allows for the expansion of federal powers beyond those specifically listed in the Constitution.