0
Valid means that the argument leads to a true conclusion, given that its premises are true, but if an argument is valid that does not necessarily mean the conclusion is correct, as its premises may be wrong. A sound argument, on the other hand, in addition to being valid all of its premises are true and hence its conclusion is also true.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
In logic, a valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. A sound argument is a valid argument with true premises. So, a sound argument is not only valid, but it also has true premises, making it both logically correct and factually accurate.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
All valid arguments are sound arguments?
This statement is not correct. A valid argument is one in which the conclusion logically follows from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true or not. A sound argument, on the other hand, is a valid argument with true premises. So, while all sound arguments are valid, not all valid arguments are sound.
What word is used to classify an argument if it is valid and all of its premises are true?
The word used to classify an argument if it is valid and all of its premises are true is "sound." A sound argument is when the logical structure of the argument is valid and all the premises are true, leading to a logically sound conclusion.
How can you tell if you are dealing with a sound argument?
A sound argument is one that is logically valid and has true premises. To determine if you are dealing with a sound argument, you need to check if the premises are true and if the reasoning is valid. If both conditions are met, then the argument is sound.
Why cant you have an argument which is invalid and sound?
An argument that is invalid is one where the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. A sound argument is one that is valid and has true premises. So, by definition, an argument cannot be both invalid and sound at the same time because for an argument to be sound it must be valid.
Is it possible to have a sound valid inductive argument?
Yes, it is possible to have a sound valid inductive argument. For an inductive argument to be sound, it must have a valid form (the conclusion must logically follow from the premises) and have true premises. This combination of validity and truth makes the argument sound.
All valid arguments are sound arguments?
This statement is not correct. A valid argument is one in which the conclusion logically follows from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true or not. A sound argument, on the other hand, is a valid argument with true premises. So, while all sound arguments are valid, not all valid arguments are sound.
What is the difference between a valid deductive argument and a fallacy?
A valid deductive argument will have a valid premise and conclusion and a fallacy may be true, it all matters on how you came to the conclusion.
Is the kalam cosmological argument sound or valid?
The kalam cosmological argument is considered by many philosophers and theologians to be both valid and sound. The argument uses logic to try to demonstrate that the universe had a cause and that this cause must be a transcendent, uncaused, and timeless being, which many identify as God. However, there is ongoing debate and criticism within the philosophical community about its premises and implications.
When you are building an argument for an issue that is significant to you do you think it is more important to be valid or sound?
For an argument to be valid, it means that if the premises of the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. Validity has to do with the form of the argument. If one or more of the premises are not true, that does not mean the argument isn't valid. Soundness means that the argument is valid, and all of it's premises are true. It's a little redundant to say "both valid and sound", because if your argument is sound, then it must be valid. It is important for an argument to be not just valid, but also sound, in order for it to be convincing.
What is the difference between a valid or invalid argument?
An invalid argument is when the facts you are using are invalid or your forms of defense are wrong or incorrect, a valid argument is the opposite of an invalid argument. "There is a windmill in my beard. your argument is invalid." (This is a good example of a bad contradiction)
What is the difference between a valid fact and a valid argument?
Facts cannot be valid. They can only be true or false. Arguments, on the other hand, can be valid. A valid argument in one which must have a true conclusion provided that the premises are true (no guarantee of that though).
Can an argument be invalid and sound?
No, but it can be unsound and valid.
What is sound and unsound?
It describes two kinds of argument in logic. A sound argument is valid (logically coherent) and its premises are true. And unsound argument is not sound.
What is the difference between sound and unsound argument?
A sound argument is a logical argument that is both valid (the conclusion logically follows from the premises) and has true premises. It is considered strong and reliable. On the other hand, an unsound argument lacks either a valid structure or true premises, making it weak and unreliable. It fails to provide a logical or factual basis for its conclusion.
When building an argument for an issue that's significant to you is it more important to be sound or valid?
For your argument to be valid and thus persuasive, your points must be sound. Otherwise, a thinking person will ignore your conclusion and dismiss your argument.
Can a sound argument have a false conclusion?
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.
What is the difference between an unsound argument and an invalid argument?
An invalid argument does not make sense logically. The statements in the argument are not connected in a rational way. A sound argument must not only be valid (logically connected) but also based on true premises. Therefore an argument may be unsound because it makes no logical sense, because the premises are flawed, or both.
