Generally speaking - and in practice - very few. Ironically, all countries with an autocratic government have onced signed the UN charter, promising their subject all kinds of rights; and most of them have beautifully written laws granting their citizens rights and freedoms and promising independent judges you can take your case to - as in most Muslim countries, Russia and China. But a right to protest is not worth much if another law puts heavy penalties on 'disturbing the public order' or 'threatening the security of the State'.
The right to be slaves and pawns of the system.
No rights. They can be told where to live, what jobs they can, where to go to school, and what they can or can not say.
No because only the leader gets to choose
hello
Cheese
None - an autocracy is a system of government by one person with absolute power
autocracy
No government form has unlimited power in the world (eventually other countries will intervene), but in a dictatorship, the dictator can do virtually whatever he wants.
Citizens have no rights under a Dictatorship.
A truly sovereign king can give citizens whatever rights he chooses. In most cases, kings did not impart those rights to any citizen.
Autocracy
The Bill of Rights has the rights of citizens.
Citizens have no rights under a Dictatorship.
citizens have all rights and freedom.
Constitutionalism sets checks and balances on Power, limits the exercise of executive powers, Guarantees the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens, and prohibits any Legislation not consistent with Constitutional Rights. Absolutism sets no limits on the exercise of Authoritarian Power, and provides no Constitutional Guarantees of Rights and Freedoms.
representative democrazy