To decide the question of whether a slave who had spent some time on free soil (where he could automatically have claimed his freedom) could apply for it when he was back in slave country.
The legal reasoning behind the ruling was that African Americans were not and could never be citizens. And, they had no judicial rights in US courts.
That the slave Scott could not have his freedom, because the Founding Fathers had declared that a man's property was sacred, and the Chief Justice reckoned that they would have included slaves in their definition of property.
Dred Scott
Dred Scott v. Sandford,* 60 US 393 (1857)*Sandford is misspelled in the court documents; the respondent's real last name was Sanford.
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?
The Supreme Court ruled in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not considered United States citizens and therefore could not file lawsuits in federal court. The court also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and asserted that Congress did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in U.S. territories.
Sherly hatton and Jerome Scott the jr. girl
Sanford Faulkner was born on March 3, 1806, in Scott County, Kentucky, USA.
When Scott's master died and left him as property in his will to his wife's family.
did you answer it
Dred Scott v. Sanford
Dred Scott v. Sanford
The Dred Scott v. Sanford decision.