they would either have to adapt to low ground ... or die.
Well, they did until humans dicided to ruin there habitat by burning and chopping down trees ( and killing, and skinning animals ) but somtimes people need to do these things for food, and survival, In other words: Animals WOULD accept there habitat if humans had not ruined it. Hope this help :) Jodie Cameron.
if people threaten for example "animals habitat", the animals would have nowhere to rest or even eat,some habitats are animals habitat and food so it is very important to not threaten a animals habitat etc. they would starve, it would be so boring without animals around wouldn't it be so?
For some people it would be shelter for animals it would be habitat or living space.
a mango trees habitat would be in forests like in India where I came from
We can set some of the grass on fire and that would destroy some animals habitat.
people are cutting down trees so the animals are loosing their habitat...
Habitat clearingIntroducing non-native animals
If there were no trees, it would impact the environment negatively in various ways. The ecosystem would be disrupted, leading to soil erosion, loss of habitat for animals, and a decrease in air quality. Additionally, it would affect the availability of resources such as wood, fruits, and medicinal plants.
Any arctic animals.
As animals like koalas possums birds and many others live in trees. And to make houses you need wood from trees, so when the tree gets cut down the animals home is gone and even sometimes the animal could still be in the tree and it can get killed when the tree falls to the ground.
Well there would be less trees because animals fertilize trees.
Mango trees live in forests. They are most abundant in places like India.