I think it would be the winner was she
Yes, it is grammatically correct.
Yes, Almighty God is grammatically correct.
"That was wrong" is a grammatically correct sentence.
This sentence is grammatically correct.
No, it is not grammatically correct. If you want someone to correct it for you, please can you explain what you are trying to refer to?
It doesn't look grammatically correct, but not everything that is correct looks that way. When you break the sentence apart, there is nothing missing. It has a subject and a predicate. Although "You are the winner" may be more appealing to most people, I do not believe there is anything grammatically incorrect with your example, as ugly as it may sound. It is correct. You can be be a subject or an object pronoun. subject - You are the winner! object - The winner is you!
"Not like that" can be grammatically correct, depending on the context.
The phrase "Is you don't miss me do you" is not grammatically correct. It should be rephrased to something like "Don't you miss me?" to be correct.
Yes! That is grammatically correct!
Yes, 'for free', is grammatically correct.
The phrase "You are not knowing" is not grammatically correct. Instead, you can use "You do not know" or "You are not aware."
Yes, Almighty God is grammatically correct.
"That was wrong" is a grammatically correct sentence.
Yes, it is grammatically correct.
The sentence "Rhoda's Crazy" is not grammatically correct. It is missing a verb to make a complete sentence.
'What a drunkard you are' is a grammatically correct English sentence.
"For free' is grammatically correct. It is an idiom of the English language.