0
The Webster-Hayne Debate was between a man named Daniel Webster and a man named Robert Hayne.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
In the Webster-Hayne debate Daniel Webster argued that?
In the debate, Webster argued that states did not have the power to nullify a federal law. He also argued that states could not secede from the Union. Daniel Webster held several offices throughout his career, including Senator from Massachusetts.
What was Webster Hayne Debate?
Derpyderp
What was Webster-Hayne Debate?
Derpyderp
Where was Daniel Webster position of nullification?
Daniel Webster strongly opposed nullification and believed that the federal government was above the states. This is made clear in the Webster-Hayne Debate of 1830, where Webster argued against pro-nullification South Carolina senator Robert Hayne.
In the Webster-Hayne debate Robert Y Hayne argued that?
http://www.ehow.com/about_5070480_significance-websterhayne-debate.html This website gives you the resolution and everyone's personal view!! it helped me tremendously!!
What was the Hayne - Webster debate?
Doctrine of Nullification.
What was the Webster -Hayne debate about?
Doctrine of Nullification.
What was the hayne-Webster debate?
It was over the doctrine of nullification
What year was the Webster-hayne debate?
In 1830 In 1830
When was the Webster-Hayne debate?
The debate was on January 19, to January 27, 1830
Who won the Webster hayne debate?
no one won- it was a tie!
What did senators Robert hayne of South Carolina and Daniel Webster of Massachusetts debate in congress in the Webster-hayne debate in 1830?
whether or not states had the right to nullify a federal law (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧
