The Rolling Stones are more likely to have more songs than The Beatles, because the band was together longer. However, if you count all the songs that The Beatles recorded, during their solo careers, the Beatles probably had more songs as they recorded probably nearly the same amount of songs as a band indivually.
Hope this answers your question :)
This is a matter of opinion. Most would say The Beatles. When they were still together, and playing, there was a Beatle Mania frenzy. Literally hundreds of thousands of people were waiting for them wherever they went!
But there are also the Rolling Stones fans that would supply similar proof!
However, from an un-biased point of view, The Beatles are much more well known, and their music is a bit better!
This has been debated for the last 45 years! the rolling stones
The Beatles
Thtas comparing apples to Oranges. Theires too many factors to consider when comparing them. I think metallica is though.
The Rolling Stones were played up in the media as the bad-boy rivals to the squeaky-clean Beatles. In truth, the members of both bands were good friends... and the Beatles weren't as innocent as they were often portrayed. Rolling Stones
no they were before
No, that was the Rolling Stones.
The Rolling Stones covered the Beatles Song "I Wanna Be Your Man" in 1963. Actually, their version came out 3 weeks before The Beatles' version did.
The Monkees
BEATLES!
No, it is by The Beatles.
rolling stones by one year
No. "Let it Be" is by the Beatles. The Rolling Stones do have a song called "Let it Bleed."
The Rolling Stones were played up in the media as the bad-boy rivals to the squeaky-clean Beatles. In truth, the members of both bands were good friends... and the Beatles weren't as innocent as they were often portrayed. Rolling Stones
The Beatles
The Yardbirds The Beatles and The Rolling Stones
the beatles
no they were before
YES
the Beatles, the rolling stones, queen,
No, that was the Rolling Stones.