Answer
John was nicknamed soft sword because he was rubbish at fighting and could not ride horses he hardly ever won any wars or fights he was involved in.
John soft sword is king john who reigned from 1199-1216
He wasn't. It's a fiction.
Softsword John And John LackLand
billy and bob Lackland and Softsword.
because the barons had to fight in his army and he was called softsword and lackland because he lost land and lost battles
He was called "Lackland" as a joke by his father when he was about five, because his older brothers already had territorial surnames from lands they had been given and John at that stage had none. There is no evidence that he actually was called "soft-sword". It's a fiction.
Here are 5 facts on King John: 1. 24th December 1166-19th October 1216 2. Johns brother Richard did not leave him enough money to rule the entire country after his death in 1199. 3. John was crowned on May 27th 1199 4. John was unpopular as ruler of Ireland and was forced to leave and return to England after only 8 months. 5. Arthur was the son of Johns brother who was murdered in a grisly fashion.
Taxation without representation. Meaning he would tax them but wouldn't let them take part in government. He would also force them to share there home, throw innocent people in jail. And once they were done with being treated that they made a document called the Magna Carta.
King Richard the Lionheart was the king at the time of Robin Hood. He ruled England from 1189 to 1199. Robin Hood's story is often associated with King Richard's reign, though historical evidence regarding the existence of Robin Hood is sparse and mostly based on folklore.
John John John John
um which john john redfriend john locks john talibin
In the King James version John - 1 _ 51 John - 2 _ 25 John - 3 _ 36 John - 4 _ 54 John - 5 _ 47 John - 6 _ 71 John - 7 _ 53 John - 8 _ 59 John - 9 _ 41 John - 10 _ 42 John - 11 _ 57 John - 12 _ 50 John - 13 _ 38 John - 14 _ 31 John - 15 _ 27 John - 16 _ 33 John - 17 _ 26 John - 18 _ 40 John - 19 _ 42 John - 20 _ 31 John - 21 _ 25 Which adds up to 879
It really depends, as lots of historians disagree about the matter. There were some good aspects about him, some bad. The only thing thing that historians can agree on is the fact that there were a lot of problems already made for him when he became King. He is known to have argued with the Pope, and lots of people at the time, including Monks, who were the main writers at the time, thought that he had to be evil because the pope was meant to be the holiest man on earth. In fact, John's father, King Henry II, had done the same thing, but only with a better result as the Pope at that time was less strong minded. In some ways King John was a good king because he fed over 1000 paupers every year. He cared for Jews and committed them into care. But in some ways king John was a bad king because historians say he starved people and crushed old men under lead blocks. ouch. By the way, all of this is true because I'm doing King John at school. king John was a very bad king as he killed his own nephew for the thrown, he lost many battles against England's rivalry countries and he was forced to sign the magna carta. However he has won battles against England ,wales and Scotland and he made England wealthy. He also cared for poor people. King John was a bad king and a bad person but he did care for people.