0
Who were from the wealthy social class in the South that owned the plantations?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who are the pratricians?
The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.
How did call and affect the social and economic life in the south?
The demand for cotton affect the social and economic life of the South by creating a system of slave plantations, a rich aristocratic class which owned 90% of the slaves
Did a small number of wealthy plantation owners control politics?
Small plantation owners, which was the secOnd highest social class in the south, controlled politics in the south.
What wealthy landowners were part of this social class?
The patricians
What class had the most social value in social darwinism?
In social Darwinism, the upper class and wealthy individuals were often seen as having the most social value. This perspective was based on the belief that those who were successful and wealthy had proven their superiority through survival of the fittest, and therefore had a greater contribution to society.
What is the social and economic level between the wealthy and the poor?
Middle class
What class did the theory of Social Darwinism say had the most value?
The wealthy
How did clothing reflect a person's social class in Aztecs?
clothing told how wealthy you were
How did clothing reflect a person's social class Aztec?
clothing told how wealthy you were
What are the two social classes in the early Roman Republic?
The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.The highest social class in ancient Rome was the patrician class. This does not necessarily mean a wealthy class, as many patricians had lost much of their family fortunes over the years. It was a social standing based on birth or senatorial or imperial appointment.
What was Socrates social class?
Socrates belonged to the middle class in Ancient Greece. He was not wealthy or powerful, but he was not impoverished either.
What is partricians?
The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.The patricians were a social class in ancient Rome. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy landowners. However over the years many of the patrician families lost their wealth, so being a patrician did not necessarily mean that the person was wealthy. It meant that he/she was born into a certain social class. Sulla and Caesar are examples of two men who were patricians and were not wealthy--at least not at the start of their careers.
