This is a question for the "decider of fact." If it is a jury case, the jury must decide who to believe. In a bench trial, the judge must decide who is more credible.
This is not a question of law, but of human nature. The "decider of fact" will consider each person's demeanor, their potential motives for lying, and whether or not their story makes sense. It isn't a procedural question, but the same as any other situation where you must decide which person is telling the truth. The decider typically won't pinpoint anything specific, but will simply feel that they believe one or the other.
Unlike a criminal case where the criteria is "guilt beyond a reasonable doubt," the rule in civil cases is only "the preponderance of the evidence."
Because they believed in killing and slaughtering blacks. At least, that's what my teacher said.
how can I get civil case enquiry
Unlike the arson case, which was a criminal case, Aaron's divorce action was a civil case.
This is the money that you receive from a civil case. It will be determined based on the case at hand.
Civil
As a general rule, no, it is not. Generally speaking, no tort case, that an individual brings against another individual, can result in the loss of liberty - however, if an individual is in violation of a court order arising out of that civil case, it is possible the individual could be jailed for civil contempt for failure to obey the COURT'S order.
How do you write a legal brief for a civil case?
no
It is a criminal case.
Civil cases are not classified as misdemeanors or felonies. The action of a civil case should have no bearing on your criminal case.
he said this because he believed that the devotees of civil rights (people who are really intereseted in civil rights) are not doing their job of helping the "Negro" Community earn their rightful place in the community as free people, not as slaves.
In a criminal case it is the accuser. In a civil case - think Judge Judy - it is the Plaintiff