answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

anti federalist believed it was a threat because it infringed on there freedoms. this is the reason the federalist papers were written and the Bill of Rights was created, to ensure people that their freedoms would be upheld by the constitution. and not taken away by the constitution

User Avatar

Eleazar Sanford

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Fabiola Kshlerin

Lvl 10
2y ago

It created a strong central government. (Nova Net)

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did the anti federalist believe that the constitution was a threat to liberty?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why did anti-federalists believe that the constitution was a threat to liberty?

anti federalist believed it was a threat because it infringed on there freedoms. this is the reason the federalist papers were written and the Bill of Rights was created, to ensure people that their freedoms would be upheld by the constitution. and not taken away by the constitution


Why did antifederalist believe that constitution was a threat to liberty?

They believed this because it had enumerated their rights, and they believed that any rights not stated in the constitution would not be given to them. Believing this, they did not want anything telling them would they could or could not do, so this is why they thought this was a threat to liberty.


Why did antifederalist believe the constitution was a threat to liberty?

They believed this because it had enumerated their rights, and they believed that any rights not stated in the constitution would not be given to them. Believing this, they did not want anything telling them would they could or could not do, so this is why they thought this was a threat to liberty.


Do you believe Caesar might indeed be a threat to roman liberty?

No.


Do the federalist papers preserve individual liberty?

Individual liberty is preserved through individual diligence. Though words can advocate liberty, or proclaim absolute rights, it is only through action that government is kept small so that individual liberty can be maximized. The Federalist Papers advocated ratification of the Constitution by arguing what the Constitution was and was not. The two factions at the time were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were those who supported the Constitution and were generally the wealthy, merchants, and those for whom a powerful centralized government was more important than individual liberty. The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, led by Patrick Henry, were generally small farmers, business owners, and the working class who believed government was a necessary evil best kept small and local. They saw the newly proposed Constitution as a threat to both individual liberty and States' rights. The Federalist Papers were a collection of letters written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, all signed "Publius", designed to persuade New Yorkers to support the ratification of the new U.S. Constitution. The compromise that was made to get the Anti-Federalists to ratify the Constitution was the agreement to create a "Bill of rights" whereby specific individual rights would be outlined, and further restrictions would be placed on the Federal Government, such as the 9th and 10th Amendments which deny Federal authority for any power not specifically enumerated in the Constitution. (Which is why 90% of the Federal Government today can be accurately described as Unconstitutional) (www.PatriotMusic.com)


Which leader refused at attend the constitution out of concern that it's efforts could be a threat to liberty?

It was Patrick Henry.


Difference between federalist and antifederalist?

The Federalists were statesmen and public figures supporting ratification of the proposed Constitution of the United States between 1787 and 1789. The Federalist Papers are documents associated with their movement.The Anti-Federalists argued that the strong national government proposed by the Federalists was a threat to the rights of individuals and that the President would become a king. They objected to the federal court system created by the proposed constitution. This produced a phenomenal body of political writing; the best and most influential of these articles and speeches were gathered by historians into a collection known as the Anti-Federalist Papers in allusion to the Federalist Papers.wikipedia.org


What did the whigs fear?

Feared the threat to liberty from the British monarch.


What did the radical whigs fear?

Feared the threat to liberty from the British monarch.


What is the biggest threat to jellyfish?

Jellyfish are eaten by squid. I believe that this is the biggest threat that they face.


What does Hamilton seem to think greatest threat to liberty?

Stripping people from freedom of speech


Why did radical Republicans believe that Catholicism was a threat to the US democracy?

The radical Republicans did believe that Catholicism was a threat to the democracy of the US because of the anti-democracy teachings then.