0
Why did most scientists reject Wegner theory for nearly a half century?
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
They rejected Wenger's theory for half a century because he didn't have the evidence to prove his theory
No, He did have evidence to prove his theory, they just did not believe him- TheSystem because of their lack of knowledge of the Earth
He actually had evidence, but it was actually because the hypothesis interferred with their own hypothesis about how mountains form.
Rosalinda Blick
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why did most scientists reject wegener theory for nearly a half century?
They rejected Wegener's theory for half a century because he could not identify the cause of continental drift.
What might cause a scientists to reject a theory?
that thars not enuph proph
Why did many scientists reject Wagner's hypothesis?
He could not prove how they moved he died before they considered his hypothesis
Why did Saint Augustine reject astrology?
St. Augustine was the most influential of these critic of astrology, writing against "vulgar astrology" and condemning its practitioners as frauds and impostors. He did not deny that celestial bodies had some influence, but rejected the determinism inherent in astrological predictions concerning fate.
Why is light reflected?
Light is an energy force which has weight. Light particles rebound back to the eye because every object has a reflective surface. Perhaps we could ask the question "Why do we see things in different colors?" Light is white in color. This white light is in actual fact a combination of all the colors of the spectrum. When light strikes an object the object will absorb some of the colors but reject others. The combination of these rejected colors give us the color we see. A green cover book is so because the colors blue and yellow were not absorbed by the material of the book cover. Some say that because some objects absorb all colors the object is seen as black, or the absence of color. So why do we still see black objects? Because even a black object has a reflective surface.
Why did most scientists reject wegener theory for nearly a half century?
They rejected Wegener's theory for half a century because he could not identify the cause of continental drift.
Why did scientists reject wegners theory of continental drift?
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
Why did scientists reject Wegner's hypothesis of Pangaea?
They rejected it because from the calculated strength of the rocks, it did not seem possible for the crust to move in this way. They began to realize that when they tried to put the continents together, they had fit! They then realize Weagener's theory was accurate
What is nearly same as deny?
reject
Why did most scientist reject Wegner?
because most scientist taught it was none sense because they taught that there was a land bridge between both continents. they said to him why don't you see them moving any more and Wegner said because the drift happens so slowly. BY THE.M.W
Why did scientists reject Wagner's ides?
Perhaps you meant "Wegener's ideas".
What might cause a scientists to reject a theory?
that thars not enuph proph
What might cause scientists to reject a popular theory?
that thars not enuph proph
How do scientists decide whether or not to reject or accept a hypothesis?
if the hypothesis is proven to be correct or incorrect
Why did most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift?
Most scientists originally reject the theory of continental drift since it did clearly explain continents would move. This is a theory that has been established by Wegener and did not get good support initially.
Why did geologists reject Alfred Wagner's idea of continental drift?
Wegner could not identify a force that could move the continents
What might cause scienctists to reject a popular theory?
Scientists treat all theories the same way, popular or not. They will reject any theory if evidence appears which contradicts it.
