answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

that thars not enuph proph

User Avatar

Yazmin Sawayn

Lvl 13
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What might cause a scientists to reject a theory?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What might cause scientists to reject a popular theory?

that thars not enuph proph


What might cause scienctists to reject a popular theory?

Scientists treat all theories the same way, popular or not. They will reject any theory if evidence appears which contradicts it.


What might cause scientists to change scientific theory?

Because technology might change in the future.


Why might a scientist reject a scientific theory?

there might not be enough proof


What is a Valid reason why a scientist might reject a scientific theory?

its to old


What is a valid reason a scientist might reject a scientific theory?

It is to old


How might the theory of evolution be used by scientists in their studies?

to explain the relationship


Why was wegener's theory not accepted by all scientists?

Wegner's theory was not accept because he didn't have much evidence to support his theory with and scientists thought that there might have been a land bridge between the continents. Another reason to why his theory was rejected was that he was a foreigner, by that; the scientists didn't really take him seriously.


How many people believe in the big bang theory?

It depends, because some might say 'scientists'. But not all scientists believe in this theory. Also, there are those who believe in a similar idea to the Big Bang, but it is not refered to as 'The Big Band Theory.'


Why did Copernicus ask for his book to be published after his death?

because he did not want to be embarresed by the Roman Catholic church because they might (and did) reject his theory


What might happen to cause scientists to change the model of an atom?

they might actually see an atom.


Why might a scientists theory might not be believed even if it correct?

A scientist's theory might not be believed even it is correct, if the theory is such a radical departure from existing beliefs that it seems bizarre. The theory of continental drift (which, of course, was eventually accepted) was resisted for decades because it just seemed obvious to people that the continents are not drifting, since we do not notice any such motion. It could also happen that a scientist has a valid theory but has not adequately explained, or experimentally tested that theory. Other scientists require evidence in order to accept a theory.