not neccesarily it depend on the way you manage your farm
Large farms operate more like a production plant than small farms. They produce large amounts of goods, but also have higher overhead too. Small farms often produce a large number of products in smaller quantities.
If such reasons exist, they are mere misconceptions. Most corporate farms are family farms themselves: it is not possible to replace a family farm with a family farm if it's still going to be a family farm, no matter how large or small it is. The term "corporation" is merely a business label applied to a firm, regardless of what kind of firm or business it is or who it is owned by. A family have just as much right to have their farm labelled as a corporation as any other family owning a non-farming business. To answer the question, many small farms have grown into large farms and have had the corporation label added because of the expressed demand for cheaper and safer food by the consumer. Consumers wield far greater power in the marketplace than the producer could ever dream of having, and as a result the producer is forced to change and adapt to comply with the kind of demands consumers demand.
There is no difference, actually. Many, if not most corporate farms are owned by families, and are still considered a family farm. The term "family farm" should never always equate to a "small farm," nor should the term "corporate farm" should ever equate to a large-scale operation owned by a multi-national company or corporation. Many family farms are very large (often being the largest farming enterprises in the country), and many corporate farms have been formed by families who wished to take advantage of the legal and accounting benefits that comes with operating such a business enterprise.
In the United States, the average farm is approximately 418 acres. The majority of farms, roughly 88 percent, are small family farms.
Small family business are a large portion of the business in the United States. It is also a large percent of employment and the new jobs that open up. It is said that family-owned businesses are the backbone of the U.S. economy.
well they are grown in large corporate farms and for their own family in small family farms
Southern colonies had rich soil and warm climate
Southern plantations were large and needed many workers, but most southern colonists lived on small family farms. plantations, but small farms were much more common.
yes, people in Georgia did have small farms and large plantations.
Collective farms were large, government controlled farms formed from small farms that were surrendered by force. These were common in socialist regimes.
collectivitzation
collectivization
Big farms require lots of relatively flat and level ground that can easily be plowed. Much of the land in New England was hilly and rocky, making it suitable for small farms worked intensively by a family or small group, but not suitable for large farms.
Large farms operate more like a production plant than small farms. They produce large amounts of goods, but also have higher overhead too. Small farms often produce a large number of products in smaller quantities.
The small farms were replaced by large landed estates (latifundia) owned by rich people.
New methods worked best on large farms, which could hire many workers and produce big harvests and more profits. This encouraged wealthy landowners to replace small farms with big ones.
small farms