If such reasons exist, they are mere misconceptions. Most corporate farms are family farms themselves: it is not possible to replace a family farm with a family farm if it's still going to be a family farm, no matter how large or small it is. The term "corporation" is merely a business label applied to a firm, regardless of what kind of firm or business it is or who it is owned by. A family have just as much right to have their farm labelled as a corporation as any other family owning a non-farming business.
To answer the question, many small farms have grown into large farms and have had the corporation label added because of the expressed demand for cheaper and safer food by the consumer. Consumers wield far greater power in the marketplace than the producer could ever dream of having, and as a result the producer is forced to change and adapt to comply with the kind of demands consumers demand.
There is no difference, actually. Many, if not most corporate farms are owned by families, and are still considered a family farm. The term "family farm" should never always equate to a "small farm," nor should the term "corporate farm" should ever equate to a large-scale operation owned by a multi-national company or corporation. Many family farms are very large (often being the largest farming enterprises in the country), and many corporate farms have been formed by families who wished to take advantage of the legal and accounting benefits that comes with operating such a business enterprise.
No difference. Corporate farming is merely a business label applied to name a farm or ranch in order for a family (or a group of people) to take advantage of the accounting and legal benefits that comes with such a label. Corporate farms can be very local, it just depends on where you are located in proximity to such farms. Any farm of any size or business-type can be deemed "local" if you live within 50 miles of it.
The main reasons for poverty are, to many in the family so less education, cost of things are going up daily, and the country often faces drought. like in India.
Between 1997 and 2002, the number of family farms declined from 1.92 million to 1.90 million. However, the number of corporate farms also declined, from 185,607 to 129,831
Yes, this is a true statement.
well they are grown in large corporate farms and for their own family in small family farms
Family farms
find a family business
Combined into corporate farms.
My family is from the upper midwest, i was wondering where the name derived from.
There are many reasons but major reasons are : family as basic training unit financial and economic reasons guidance and supervision of youth and security
The Stuarts
Narrate
Brian Forster
The most resounding fact is that 98% of such farms are family-owned and operated.
The Santander family of banks has its origins and corporate seat in Spain.