answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Jews have a lot of opinions and a lot of perspectives within their small 14-million large population. It would be absurd if everyone outside of this group magically agreed with everything the Jews put out if the Jews cannot even agree amongst themselves.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Indoctrination into bigoted patterns of thought is probably the main reason.

One may have a valid theological issue with Judaism, or even dispute the validity of the existence of the State of Israel, without being bigoted.

But if one has an issue with Jews then bigotry is the source of that issue. Bigotry is almost always a learned thought pattern. Indoctrination might occur as a child through parents, teachers, or friends. It might occur as an adult through strong religious leaders, or as a result of encountering wrong information from various media. However and whenever the indoctrination occurs, it leads to bigotry.

The only answer to bigotry, whether the targets are Jews, homosexuals, Christians, blacks, Americans, or any other group of individuals, is for people to take very seriously the formation of their opinions. A constant vigilance is required. We must hold ourselves to the most stringent standards in reviewing what we believe and why we believe it.

Often, people confuse the right to have an opinion with the right to have an opinion that is respected. The former is a right---we may each think as we choose. The latter is not a right at all. Respect for our opinions must be earned, and our careful work in cleansing fallacious, ungrounded, or suspect "opinions" from our minds and discourse is the only way to earn that respect.

Answer:

TO THE TOP ANSWER-VERY WELL SAID

First off,

Against stupidity; God Himself is helpless.

-Jewish Proverb

Therefore hatred, is embitterment which is someone who is helpless and overly justified. (In their mind) If you are impartial, then you will recognize its stupidity and that Jewish people see people who have issues with them as helpless. There culture is strong. They don't care to recognize helpless hateful people

who have issues with there whole culture, a culture that allows people to live a way of life.

I would like to be more specific since the Jewish faith are of unique being. People who have issues with the Jews are Anyone who is overly disgusted and blame them for what happened to Jesus. Anyone who is trying to oppress a minority who prides themselves on having an education and follows a different value system.

Anyone who thinks the whole land of Israel belongs to their faith/religion.

Anyone who only knows a small number of Jews and only see's them as being in money oriented businesses and that have been screwed by those people. INCLUDES LAWYERS.(that what I think happened to Mel Gibson.)

The Jewish and Muslim faith in other's views are a bit to very oppressive to women and some people think its a repression of freedom.

The Jewish Faith is very strong in Laws and have many laws in fact and for some that is an issue being close near strictness while not willing to adapt to it. From 1 law to however many laws, the Jewish Faith is one of the Oldest faiths and some feel some laws are selfish or outdated but that is mainly due to misinterpretation.

People also are protective since many non-Jews are proned to believing a Jew will stick up for the other Jew and easily swindle or not care about the other.

In the end Jews and Christians are willing to truth their own faith when it comes to not knowing facts and having to defend principle and more over vs anti semitism/ the equivalent of anti antisemitism towards Christians.) .

There are a lot of hateful jokes and Propaganda towards the Jewish faith because of the bigotry that existed in Europe for many centuries due to the fact that the majority of Europeans blamed Jews for what happened to Jesus.

So types of bigtry towards the Jews have been practiced and evolved WHICH IS SICKENING. It is easy to put blame into things and for long times people have practiced blaming the Jews.

I live in an area that is mainly of Jewish people and I must say when I do witness someone accusing or calling a Jew of being cheap, it is so often the kettle calling the pot black.

Its funny how when A Jew hustles its called swindling and when anyones swindles its called hustling..... just people hating on the Jews for normal humane habits anyone in the world could have.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

See the Related Questions.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why have people disagreed with the Jews?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What did Jews do to survive?

Nothing they couldn't do anything coz if they disagreed with hitler they were killed anyway


Why did people disagree with Hitler's Anti-Semitic policies?

Some disagreed with Hitler's Anti-Semitic policy on moral grounds and others disagreed on pragmatic grounds and still others on self-interest grounds. Those who disagreed on moral grounds typically made the argument that since Jews are humans who have committed no illegal activities, they deserve the same rights and treatments as the rest of humanity. They did not deserve to be forcibly segregated and slaughtered like animals. Some came at this conclusion from a global Human Rights perspective and others came at this conclusion from having friends who were Jews and so had a personal connection that they realized was in jeopardy. Those who disagreed on pragmatic grounds were usually not opposed to Anti-Semitism in principle (otherwise they would have taken that tack) and may even have believed that slaughtering the Jews would be morally acceptable. However, they held that the act of going through with the segregation of Jews and/or their annihilation was not the wisest allocation of resources. There was an incredible amount of money, metal, and building materials that Nazi Germany had to divert from the war effort in order to exterminate the Jews and it was not justifiable from an economic perspective. Those who disagreed on self-interest grounds were either Jews or other minorities that feared that they could become the targets of Anti-Semitic policies and they disagreed with the policies because they and their communities would be materially injured by the Anti-Semitic policies.


How did Hitler control the people who disagreed with him?

He got his army to kill them.


What people were people were persecuted during the holocaust?

jews.


Why did people leave the England church?

Because they disagreed with the ostentation of luxury shown by the church

Related questions

What did Jews do to survive?

Nothing they couldn't do anything coz if they disagreed with hitler they were killed anyway


Why did the Nazis think negatively about the Jews?

Hitler brainwashed them. Also, many disagreed but were afraid to speak.


What happened to those people who disagreed with leaders in Massachusetts?

They disagreed because they were not free and did not agree with there rules. This is why they disagreed with the leaders of Massachusetts. <3333


What is was the inpact of the holocaust?

The money was running low and many people (jews, homosexuals, gypsies, russians and basically anyone who was different or who disagreed with Hitler were abused and made sure to be rid of.)


Did schindler genuinely care for the Jews?

Because he disagreed with Hitler. He didn't want to let those people die.


Why has Hitler been disliked throughout history?

Of course he was one of the worst men in history. He disrespected Jews, gypsies, ignorant people, other types of Christians and even other Germans who disagreed with him, He discriminated many other people as well.


Why did people disagree with Hitler's Anti-Semitic policies?

Some disagreed with Hitler's Anti-Semitic policy on moral grounds and others disagreed on pragmatic grounds and still others on self-interest grounds. Those who disagreed on moral grounds typically made the argument that since Jews are humans who have committed no illegal activities, they deserve the same rights and treatments as the rest of humanity. They did not deserve to be forcibly segregated and slaughtered like animals. Some came at this conclusion from a global Human Rights perspective and others came at this conclusion from having friends who were Jews and so had a personal connection that they realized was in jeopardy. Those who disagreed on pragmatic grounds were usually not opposed to Anti-Semitism in principle (otherwise they would have taken that tack) and may even have believed that slaughtering the Jews would be morally acceptable. However, they held that the act of going through with the segregation of Jews and/or their annihilation was not the wisest allocation of resources. There was an incredible amount of money, metal, and building materials that Nazi Germany had to divert from the war effort in order to exterminate the Jews and it was not justifiable from an economic perspective. Those who disagreed on self-interest grounds were either Jews or other minorities that feared that they could become the targets of Anti-Semitic policies and they disagreed with the policies because they and their communities would be materially injured by the Anti-Semitic policies.


When people disagreed with the puritans what did they do?

because tey are dum


what did stalin create for people who disagreed with the government?

The gulags


Was Jesus not a Jew himself?

Jesus was a Jew. However, the government at that time disagreed with his views and teachings and the Jews believed he was a false messiah.


How did Hitler control the people who disagreed with him?

He got his army to kill them.


Who didn't agree with nelson Mandela?

Many people disagreed with him.