Albert Einstein said religion without science is blind and science without religion is lame the seeming opposites can coexist because personality basis for existence and consciousness is moral foundation
G PADMANABHAN
Religion had no standard set of morals or ethics. When this question is posed the "religion" sponsoring the right views of ethics and morality is always the one favoured bty the speaker.Science generally is the result of proof and testing and is pretty much consistent around the world. Religion is based on tradition and lore and has no consistent basis.
There is often an attempt to drag Einstein into this question. he however did not say what the out of context quote appears to say. See the appended: https://newrepublic.com/article/115821/einsteins-famous-quote-science-religion-didnt-mean-taught
The popes curiosity
The Victorian Trinity are Religion, Science, and Morality.
No. They can easily coexist, in perfect harmony, once the scope and limitations of each are acknowledged.
Morality is a branch of philosophy, not science.
A:You take the morality out of religion. Without an ethical foundation, you can teach religion during mathematics, reading, science or social studies classes, and pretend that you are not breaking any rules.
They can live peacefully if the fanatics stick to their own business. Easy as that
Boyle viewed religion as essential to a well-ordered society and believed that science and religion could coexist harmoniously. He supported the idea that studying the natural world could lead to a deeper understanding and appreciation of God's creation. Boyle's work in both science and theology reflected his belief in the compatibility of faith and reason.
well my friend, there is no science to morality. Morality is judged by your own standards. In a way there is a scienc to it; your brain has the ability to choose. For instance, right and wrong since that is usually a topic tagged onto morality. I hope that is a good answer!
John Lightfoot was an Irish philosopher and Anglican bishop known for his attempts to reconcile science and religion. He believed that both realms could coexist peacefully and sought to find common ground between the two disciplines.
Religion is not a science.
R. C. Wallace has written: 'Science and religion' -- subject(s): Religion and science 'Religion, science and the modern world' -- subject(s): Religion and science
Yes, some questions related to morality, purpose, and the existence of a higher power may be better addressed by religion, as it deals with subjective beliefs and values. Science, on the other hand, is more suited for answering questions about the physical world and natural phenomena through empirical evidence and experimentation.