0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Why was the United States nations more powerful than the league of nations?
b
Why was the uniteds nations more powerful than the league of nations?
The United Nations was led by the Security Council. The United Nations had more resources. the united nations had strong enforcement power
Why was the United states more powerful than the League of nations?
b
What effect did the US not joining the League of Nations have.Is there more then one?
One effect would be that America wouldn't be able to rely on the support of the League of Nations if it needed it. It also means that the League of Nations wouldn't be able to call upon America, who was, and still is, a rather powerful and influential nation.
Did the united nations have more success start then the league of nations?
yes
Why was a new organization the united nations created to replace the league of nations?
The League did not have a powerful armed force and could not enforce the required resolutions. It could not keep its economic sanctions. It failed to prevent the second world war. Hence it was replaced by the United Nations.
What measures were taken at the end of World War 1 to maintain peace?
There was a treaty that the League of Nations which is kind of like the United Nations. This is more details about the League of Nations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Nations
What was true about China in the S's?
Many European nations were more powerful
What was similar to the league of nations?
The United Nations (UN) is similar to the League of Nations as both were intergovernmental organizations aimed at promoting peace and cooperation among countries. Both were established after major world wars with the intention of preventing future conflicts. However, the UN has been more successful in terms of membership and global influence compared to the League of Nations.
Why was the United Nations more sucsessful then the leaugue of nations?
The United Nations was more successful in a way because it is still standing today. The League of Nations fell apart after World War II when countries like Germany, Italy, Spain, and Japan left from it. The league of nations tried to keep their plan to prevent war, which didn't happen when World War II came. The United Nations cam apart shortly afterwards and so far, no wars.
Did Theodore Roosevelt support the League of Nations?
He eventually supported the league-of-nations, although he continued to believe that U.S. military leadership was essential to world peace.Read more: theodore-roosevelt
Why UN is more stable than League of Nations?
Due to the advent of globalization, and the internet. The UN nations have become more informatized, on this epoch, and such fact contributes for the stabilization.
