The monasteries were dissolved for a number of reasons:
* Henry VIII was basically bankrupt following wars with France and needed to raise capital. Dissolution of the monasteries, seizure of their land would bring in capital.
* Smaller (less profitable) monasteries were dissolved first. The process masqueraded as a purifying mission to rid the new Anglican church of the sorts of excesses which had been recently criticised by Luther Et Al throughout Europe.
* Following the break with Rome, all of this was a lot easier as Henry did not have anyone to answer to regarding clerical issues. (It should be noted that dissolution of monasteries was not necessarily religiously motivated)
* Monasteries were a central part of the local communities. By eradicating these, Henry was essentially centralizing English society; a form of capitalism often debated as 'Absolute' rule. (i.e. Dictatorship)
Everyone living in England and Wales at the time was affected to some extent by the dissolution of the monasteries, but the people most affected would be the monks who used to live in them. Also the sick people who used to be cared for by the monks (they ran the first hospitals).
Err...Henry VIII was one for sure
There was also Thomas Cromwell and the Monks and Nuns
Dunno any others
this means bit by bit like a planned out solution
no people were not benifited by the diisloution of the monastery
the consequences of the dissolution of the monasteries were that we now have a church of England and C.e schools Etc.
Henry the eighth took jewls
The dissolution of the monastries was when Henry the eight destroyed all monastries and nunarys and killed most nuns and monks to reastablish his power
because people have nothing to better to do so they either start drama or gets involed in it! :)
After the monasteries were dissolved, almshouses and hospitals had an increased importance of looking after those unable to do so themselves. The motivation was different, with people in charge of these establishments wanting to increase their renown or image rather than viewing it as a religious mission or vocation.
workers and people :)
three you sponsor, you and the bishop
Leonardo De Caprio
In some ways it was good because those people who didn't know Latin could now understand the services also the poor people weren't less likely to make it heaven because the rich could buy their way to heaven. But there are other ways in which it was bad; Such as, because those who worked in monasteries had no jobs and were often forced to beg to make a living even though they were trying to cut down and stop people from begging.
Monasteries are built and run as religious retreats, where devout people can go and study in peace and quiet.
FDR and Hideki Tojo
Monks were, and are, men who are devoted to religious life. They live in buildings called monasteries. So monks are people are monasteries are buildings, so in that way they are not alike at all.
In the beginning half of his reign he was very popular and the people loved him. later on, after the dissolution of the monasteries and the removal of roman catholicism and the introduction to the English church, he lost alot of popularity. By the end of his reign he was not very popular with the people at all. He also lost a lot of supporters after the split from Catherine of Aragon whom most people loved.
i need to know the answer