As you are aware, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed into law this week by President Obama will require private health insurance companies to allow dependent children up to age 26 to remain on their parent's policy.
TRICARE, the health insurance for military service members, retirees, and the families of both, is under the control of the U.S. Department of Defense and governed by a different section of the United States code, so it will not be affected in any way by the new health reform legislation. Unfortunately for your children, that includes this new expansion of benefits for young people.
Recognizing this gap in benefits, U.S. Representative Martin Heinrich (NM-1) introduced H.R. 4923, the TRICARE Dependent Coverage Extension Act, in the House Armed Services Committee. The bill would increase the maximum age to 26 and provide active duty military, military retirees and their beneficiaries with the same new benefits given to civilians.
"Our military families stand behind our troops and lift them up, often making significant sacrifices like our service members themselves," said Rep. Heinrich. "Allowing parents to provide health coverage to their dependent adult children is just one of the many small things we can do to show our military families how much we appreciate them and honor their service to our country."
Whitney Potter, Congressman Heinrich's Press Secretary, also told us that "the bill still needs to get approved by the House Armed Service Committee and may be part of the bigger National Defense Authorization Act, which may not get passed until the end of the year."
No, although they may be able to extend health benefits until mid 20s (check with your benefits coordinator).
Yes. In states where same-sex marriage is legal, although a business is never required to extend benefits to the spouses of its workers, if it chooses to offer benefits, then the business may not exclude same-sex spouses since that would be discriminatory. Now, why would a business extend benefits to anybody's spouse if they are not required to? Well, some jobs do provide benefits and the reason they do is to attract and retain more talented workers. Businesses need to compete for the best workers. For this same reason, even in states where same-sex marriage is NOT legally recognized, many businesses, especially large, successful ones, do extend benefits to the same-sex partners of their workers. Another reason for offering benefits, and one that is worth mentioning, is that the extension of such benefits is the result of collective bargaining by unionized workers and unions have a duty of fair representation for all of their members. Actually, as part of recent legislation, it is required that businesses who offer benefits to employees (those required to do so by federal law) must extend those benefits to spouses and children who do not have other forms of coverage. These businesses (and the insurance companies) may charge higher premiums (much higher in some cases), but no legal spouse or dependent may be denied.
excursion are used to extend children's interest
No, Alabama does not.
No, Colorado does not.
Yes.
No, Georgia does not.
No, Idaho does not.
No, Indiana is not.
No, Kansas does not.
No, MIchigan does not.
No, Mississippi does not.