answersLogoWhite

0

AllQ&AStudy Guides
Best answer

The majority opinion held that categorical exclusion of blacks from juries for no other reason than their race violated the Equal Protection Clause.


This answer is:
Related answers

The majority opinion held that categorical exclusion of blacks from juries for no other reason than their race violated the Equal Protection Clause.


View page

People cannot be excluded from serving on court juries on the basis of race.

View page

Nevada, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Virginia and West Virginia.

View page

Hernandez v. Texas was an appeal of a Texas Supreme Court decision that upheld the exclusion of Mexican-American jurors from a trial in which the defendant was Mexican-American.

The US Supreme Court determined the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause applied to more than two races, and that Mexican-Americans (and others) could not be excluded on the basis of race. This was a reasonable extension of prior interpretation of the Amendment.

In the opinion of the Court, Chief Justice Earl Warren cited a nearly identical case, Strauder v. West Virginia, (1879), as precedent. In Strauder, the Court declared otherwise qualified African-Americans couldn't be excluded from jury duty. Strauder was reaffirmed by numerous other cases, such as Gibson v. Mississippi, (1896), Carter v. Texas,(1900), Norris v. Alabama, (1935), etc. The Warren Court adhered to the doctrine of stare decisis, with the only exception being the particular group(s) to which the decision applied.

Case Citation:

Hernandez v. Texas, 347 US 475 (1954)

View page

Nevada

Vermont

Virginia

West Virginia
Nevada, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia

View page
Featured study guide
📓
See all Study Guides
✍️
Create a Study Guide
Search results